Lexical Access in Bilingual Production.

By Albert Costa. 2005

311 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/62e68c885e1affe0be6466056f58acb09e9c9800

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Bilingualism aids conflict resolution: evidence from the ANT task. (2008, background): “It is not the goal of the present article to assess the validity of such models (see Costa, 2005; for a discussion).”
Executive Control in Bilingual Language Processing (2006, background): “In learning (and sustaining) a second (or third) language, the brain has to build on a neural network that enables the segregation of the new language from the native one, the creation of its corresponding activation and inhibitory links at the lexical, morphological, and syntactic level, and,…”
Where does the delay in L2 picture naming come from? Psycholinguistic and neurocognitive evidence on second language word production (2011, background): “Note that rejecting the competition account does not necessarily mean rejecting the language nonselectivity account: it is conceivable that nontarget language items are activated but do not compete for selection and hence do not slow down the selection of target language items (Costa, 2005; Costa, M”
Bilingual Minds (2009, background): “, & Costa, A. (2008). Does bilingualism hamper lexical”
Language selectivity is the exception, not the rule: Arguments against a fixed locus of language selection in bilingual speech (2006, methodology): “As noted above, one version of the language-selective model (e.g. Costa et al., 1999; Costa, 2005) makes the assumption that selection but not activation is language specific.”
What causes the bilingual disadvantage in verbal fluency?: The dual-task analogy (2010, background): “…consensus among researchers of bilingualism that the dominant language interferes with production in the non-dominant language (for exceptions, see Costa, 2005; La Heij, 2005), and all models that accept the notion of interference between languages propose an asymmetry such that interference is…”
Cognitive control and lexical access in younger and older bilinguals. (2008, background): “Although there is some debate about the underlying reason for the bilingual disadvantage in lexical retrieval, substantial agreement exists that there is parallel activation of both languages when bilinguals are using one of them (Beauvillain & Grainger, 1987; Brysbaert, Van Dyck, & Van de Poel, 199”
Language control in bilinguals: Monolingual tasks and simultaneous interpreting (2006, background): “Given the occurrence of such changes, especially the neural changes, Costa and Santesteban’s (2004) observation that near balanced bilingualism appeared to have caused a qualitative change in the switching behavior of bilinguals – a change that also appears to be operative when they switch between o”
Natural codeswitching knocks on the laboratory door (2006, background): “…is a clear explanation for observed differences in reaction times across the bilingual’s languages when the switch of a single word is part of a full clause is still open for discussion, at least based on findings in Costa and Santesteban (2004) and discussions in Costa (2005) and Meuter (2005).”
Bilingualism: The good, the bad, and the indifferent* (2009, background): “Manipulating the relation between the words in the two languages, for example, by controlling the cognate value or adjusting word frequency, systematically changes bilingual performance (Costa, 2005), suggesting that there is a central role for the relation between the words in these effects.”
The dynamics of bilingual lexical access (2006, background): “In contrast, the so-called cascade models (Dell, 1986; Starreveld and La Heij, 1995, 1996; Caramazza, 1997; Rapp and Goldrick, 2000; Navarrete and Costa, 2005) assume that any activated lexical representation spreads some activation to its phonological segments.”
Control mechanisms in bilingual language production: Neural evidence from language switching studies (2008, background): “And this seems to be the case (Costa & Santesteban, 2004) but the precise effects of relative dominance remain unclear (see Philipp et al., 2007). Intriguingly, for speakers highly proficient in L1 and L2, there was no asymmetry when these speakers switched between L1 and L3 or between L2 and L3 (Co”
Juggling Two Languages in One Mind (2008, background): “Information about both languages is active (e.g., Costa, 2005; Kroll et al., 2006) often to the point where the translation of the word to be spoken is on the tip of the bilingual’s tongue.”
More use almost always a means a smaller frequency effect: Aging, bilingualism, and the weaker links hypothesis. (2008, background): “…representations in both languages (Green, 1998; Hermans, Bongaerts, de Bot, & Schreuder, 1998; Lee & Williams, 2001; Poulisse, 1997; for reviews see Costa, 2005; La Heij, 2005), even when the task requires bilinguals to speak in just one language (Colomé, 2001; Costa, Caramazza, &…”
Bilingualism: Consequences for Mind and Brain (2012, background): “However, performance also requires a selection bias towards the target language, showing a role for activation [66, 67] as well as inhibition.”
Understanding the Consequences of Bilingualism for Language Processing and Cognition (2013, background): “…evidence for the parallel activation of the bilingual’s two languages comes from research on lexical production, where the intention to speak a word in one language is not sufficient to constrain activation to lexical candidates in that language (e.g., Costa, 2005; Kroll et al., 2006).”