The Impact of Corruption on Entry Strategy: Evidence from Telecommunication Projects in Emerging Economies

By Klaus Uhlenbruck, Peter Rodriguez, Jonathan P. Doh, Lorraine Eden. Organ. Sci., 2006

553 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Accounting, Sociology and Political Science, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/62e0c0fc412f569c037951e0f94a803ded1aae0b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

In Sociology and Political Science

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

Corruption in Asia: Pervasiveness and arbitrariness (2007, background): “Although research on the impact of corruption on firms is recently highlighted (Habib & Zurawicki, 2002; Uhlenbruck et al., 2006), less attention was paid to this line of research: the so-called supply side of corruption.”
Is ‘Good’ governance good for business? A cross-national analysis of firms in African countries☆ (2012, background): “Poor governance also increases the risk of doing business in a country (Delios & Henisz, 2003; Uhlenbruck et al., 2006) and can decrease profitability levels by creating additional expenses, reducing the levels of investments, by leading the firm to invest in projects with immediate returns, and by ”
When Employees Do Bad Things for Good Reasons: Examining Unethical Pro-Organizational Behaviors (2011, background): “At the national level, governmental leniency toward certain unethical practices may also foster unethical practices (Park 2003, Rodriguez et al. 2005, Uhlenbruck et al. 2006).”
Corruption, South African Multinational Enterprises and Institutions in Africa (2014, background): “tively little research on how MNEs deal with corruption in emerging markets specifically (Li 2009; Uhlenbruck et al. 2006).”
Institutions and Entrepreneurship Quality (2018, background): “The existence of corruption in a society increases uncertainty and ambiguity for its entrepreneurs (Rodriguez et al., 2005; Shleifer & Vishny, 1993) and renders every transaction less transparent (Uhlenbruck et al., 2006) and adds additional costs onto each transaction.”