Stereotype activation and inhibition

By R. Wyer. 2013

217 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/62ce6e24a538b7fecd5e19ab15a5e92da6f29fb5

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Molecular Biology

Citations in the corpus

Manipulating subcategory salience: exploring the link between skin tone and social perception of Blacks (2004, background): “The research described in this paper explores the role of skin tone variation in the mental representation of Blacks from the perspective of social psychological research on social categorization and social perception (e.g. Bodenhausen & Macrae, 1998; Brewer, 1988; Fiske & Neuberg, 1990).”
Differentially dangerous? Phenotypic racial stereotypicality increases implicit bias among ingroup and outgroup members (2011, background): “While categorization models of stereotyping focus on stereotyping between racial groups (Bodenhausen & Macrae, 1998; Fiske & Neuberg, 1990; Fiske & Taylor, 1991), within-group differences in stereotyping can occur on top of category differences, providing an additional route through which bias may…”
The Influence of Afrocentric Facial Features in Criminal Sentencing (2004, methodology): “First, as suggested by standard stereotyping models (Bodenhausen & Macrae, 1998; Brewer, 1988; Fiske & Neuberg, 1990), racial-category membership may be inferred from Afrocentric features, and category-based stereotyping may ensue on that basis.”
When “Just Say No” is not enough: Affirmation versus negation training and the reduction of automatic stereotype activation☆ (2008, background): “Hence, a more eVective means to change unwanted stereotyping is to combat the automatic activation of stereotypes in the Wrst place rather than to deliberately control their inXuence on behavior once they are activated (Bodenhausen & Macrae, 1998).”
Why dieters fail : Testing the goal conflict model of eating (2017, background): “Importantly, this inhibition process can occur outside conscious awareness (e.g., Bodenhausen & Macrae, 1998; Shah et al., 2002).”
On Construing Others: Category and Stereotype Activation from Facial Cues (2006, background): “…on their applicable social groups (e.g., sex, race, age) instead of in terms of their unique collections of attributes and idiosyncratic propensities (e.g., “purchases organic vegetables,” “enjoys barbequed brisket”)—(Bodenhausen & Macrae, 1998; Kunda & Spencer, 2003; Macrae & Bodenhausen, 2000).”
My Eyes Are Up Here: The Nature of the Objectifying Gaze Toward Women (2013, background): “Because the objectifying gaze emerged at relatively short durations immediately upon viewing the women, one theoretical lens that might inform the perceiver side of objectification theory is a dual model of impression formation for person perception (Bodenhausen and Macrae 1998; Brewer 1988; Fiske a”
Social norms and the expression and suppression of prejudice: the struggle for internalization. (2002, unknown): “These data help bring the modern work on the suppression of prejudice and stereotyping (e.g., Bodenhausen & Macrae, 1998; Monteith et al., 1998) in line with Sherif and Sherif’s (1953; Sherif, 1936) group norm theory of attitudes.”
The Functional Theory of Counterfactual Thinking (2008, background): “Such a mechanism has already been discussed with regard to visual recognition (Peterson, 1994), verbal comprehension (Gernsbacher & Faust, 1991; Swinney, 1979; Twilley & Dixon, 2000), and stereotyping (Bodenhausen & Macrae, 1998).”
Political Neuroscience: The Beginning of a Beautiful Friendship (2014, background): “…the social psychological literature on person perception suggests that attributes such as race and sex are categorized rapidly and automatically ( Bodenhausen & Macrae , 1998 ; Brewer , 1988 ; Fiske & Neuberg , 1990 ) , the specific timing and sequence of social categorization processes has been…”
Category membership moderates the inhibition of social identities (2004, background): “Social perceivers must navigate among these multiple categories when making decisions about others, constantly determining which categories are situationally important and which are not (e.g., Bodenhausen & Macrae, 1998).”
Stereotyping Against Your Will: The Role of Inhibitory Ability in Stereotyping and Prejudice among the Elderly (2000, background): “Bodenhausen and Macrae (1998) refer to this type of suppression as hierarchical (or top-down) inhibition, and their data suggest that when people try to suppress stereotypes they often show a similar rebound effect (Macrae, Bodenhausen, & Milne, 1998; Macrae, Bodenhausen, Milne, & Jetten, 1994).”
Social Categorization and the Perception of Social Groups (2012, background): “Once established, such subtypes can function much the same as any other category does (e.g., Brewer, Dull, & Lui, 1981), competing with other bases for construal in the category selection process (see Bodenhausen & Macrae, 1998).”
Of Warrior Chiefs and Indian Princesses: The Psychological Consequences of American Indian Mascots (2008, background): “A stereotype accessibility perspective (Bodenhausen & Macrae, 1998; Dijksterhuis & van Knippenberg, 1999; Kawakami et al., 1998; Macrae et al., 2002) suggests that if American Indians are frequently and consistently associated with only a few traits, images or behavioral tendencies, then powerful,…”
Individual differences in working memory capacity and dual-process theories of the mind. (2004, background): “Suppression effects have been well documented in person perception and stereotyping processes (for summaries of such effects, see Bodenhausen & Macrae, 1998; Devine & Monteith, 1999; Wilson & Brekke, 1994).”
Prosocial Behavior, Solidarity, and Framing Processes (2006, background): “At the same time, aspects that have been pushed into the background may be inhibited, thus creating a double selective effect (see Bodenhousen and Macrae, 1998; Houghton and Tipper, 1996).”