The potentiation of grasp types during visual object categorization

By Mike Tucker, Rob Ellis. 2001

539 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/62a27eff760f58905f6a817e635349318905ee24

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

In Social Psychology

Citations in the corpus

The Hierarchical Organisation of Cortical and Basal-Ganglia Systems: A Computationally-Informed Review and Integrated Hypothesis (2013, unknown): “(2010, 2012)) proposed to account for compatibility effects studied in cognitive psychology (Ellis and Tucker, 2001)(1), integrates the key features of the cortical”
The Brain — A Mediating Organ (2011, background): “The knife is perceived as “readyto-hand” in an embodied sense, because the motor system is actually involved in its perception (see also Tucker & Ellis 2001).”
Embodied Language: A Review of the Role of the Motor System in Language Comprehension (2008, background): “A key role in language processing is assigned to Broca’s area as a production– comprehension interface, with a ventral-to-dorsal gradient of semantic, syntactic, and phonological processing, respectively ( Jeannerod, 2006, p. 156).”
The interactive brain hypothesis (2012, background): “Humans are pre-disposed to engagement in interactions that include the material and social world (e.g., Trevarthen, 1979; Trevarthen and Aitken, 2001; Tucker and Ellis, 2001), which plastically (re-)shape the functionality and structure of the brain.”
The Unconscious Mind (2008, background): “For example, findings suggest that ambient stimuli (e.g., hammers) automatically set us to physically interact with the world (e.g., perform a power grip, Tucker & Ellis, 2001).”
Young children make scale errors when playing with dolls. (2006, background): “This representation includes a motor plan for interacting with a larger version of the object (Barsalou, Simmons, Barbey & Wilson, 2003; Tucker & Ellis, 1998, 2001 ).”
Grounding conceptual knowledge in modality-specific systems. (2003, background): “Knowledge of these hand shapes later interacts with motor responses for making unrelated judgments [ 29 ].”
TRoPICALS: a computational embodied neuroscience model of compatibility effects. (2010, methodology): “…the dorsal system is a good candidate for encoding visuomotor representations based on physical characteristics of objects, and for biasing the activation of lowlevel relevant object-action associations, based on past history of the individuals’ interactions with objects (Tucker & Ellis, 2001).”
The 'Visual Depiction Effect' in Advertising: Facilitating Embodied Mental Simulation Through Product Orientation (2012, unknown): “This competition for resources has been shown on a behavioral level as well (Unnava, Agarwal, and Haugtvedt 1996).”
Sensory marketing, embodiment, and grounded cognition: A review and introduction (2014, background): “Such spontaneous simulations can even be observed when people merely read a word (e.g., Tucker & Ellis, 2001) — and exposure to “hammer” elicits a different type of grasp (“power” versus “precision”) than exposure to “grape”, reflecting the differential motor activity that would be appropriate in…”
Naturalizing joint action: A process-based approach (2012, background): “The compatibility between potential action can facilitate cognition before and while it unfolds (Glenberg & Kaschak, 2002; as other examples see Tucker & Ellis, 2001, for perception; Ross, Wang, Kramer, Simons, & Crowell, 2007, for categorization; Grant & Spivey, 2003; Thomas & Lleras, 2007, for…”
Dissociating object-based and space-based affordances (2005, background): “Nevertheless, the ``attention-directing hypothesis'' stands as a serious alter- native to the ``affordance hypothesis'' (although it is not clear how it speaks to the nonspatial findings of Tucker and Ellis, 2001 that related to object size).”