The Flipped Classroom
By Heng Ngee Mok. 2019
550 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/627d299b2359a81035b717726e9effacfe0b5b96
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Chung Kwan Lo
- Khe Foon Timothy Hew
- A. Karabulut-Ilgu
- Yea-Ru Tsai
- C. Jahren
- N. J. Cherrez
- Joseph P. Vitta
- Melissa Bond
Citations in the corpus
- A systematic review of research on the flipped learning method in engineering education (2018, background): “…working with their peers (Bailey & Smith, 2013; Ghadiri et al., 2014; Love et al., 2014; Talbert & Valley, 2012) and having the instructor available for help (Clark, Norman, & Besterfield-Sacre, 2014; Lemley et al., 2013; McGivney-Burelle & Xue, 2013; Mok, 2014; Swithenbank & DeNucci, 2014).”
- Promotion of learner autonomy within the framework of a flipped EFL instructional model: perception and perspectives (2019, background): “As Mok (2014) mentioned, students ‘had the option to watch each video lecture as many times as required to be prepared for class’ (p. 7).”
- The impact of flipped classrooms on student achievement in engineering education: A meta‐analysis of 10 years of research (2019, background): “Finally, the flipped classroom has been found to improve student engagement (Papadopoulos & Roman, 2010) and their professional skills (Mok, 2014) in some engineering courses.”