Leading questions and memory: Pragmatic constraints

By D. H. Dodd, J. Bradshaw. 1980

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Explanation in Artificial Intelligence: Insights from the Social Sciences (2017, background): “Dodd and Bradshaw [38] demonstrates that the perceived intention of a speaker is”
How Gullible are We? A Review of the Evidence from Psychology and Social Science (2017, background): “, & Druckman, J. N. (2007). Framing public opinion in competitive democracies.”
Learning facts from fiction. (2003, background): “For example, in eyewitness studies, suggestibility is reduced when subjects know the post-event communication was produced by a less credible source such as a na€ iive interviewer (Smith & Ellsworth, 1987) or a defense lawyer ( Dodd & Bradshaw, 1980 ).”
Innocent But Proven Guilty: Eliciting Internalized False Confessions Using Doctored-Video Evidence (2009, background): “Research shows that people can and do evaluate the source of a suggestion before accepting it as fact (Dodd & Bradshaw, 1980; Vornik, Sharman, & Garry, 2003), and people are well informed about the advances of digital software.”
Conversational apprentices: Helping children become competent informants about their own experiences (2006, background): “…on the features of the event such that children are better able to resist misleading suggestions if they pertain to central or ‘core’ rather than peripheral features of the event (e.g. Cassel, Roebers, & Bjorklund, 1996; Dent & Stephenson, 1979; Dodd & Bradshaw, 1980; King & Yuille, 1987).”
The Psychology of Interrogations and Confessions: A Handbook (2003, background): “Further evidence for this comes from a study by Dodd and Bradshaw (1980) into the effects of pragmatic conditions on the acceptance of misleading information.”
How to protect eyewitness memory against the misinformation effect: A meta-analysis of post-warning studies (2014, background): “There are of course studies in which the credibility of the source is suspicious from the beginning, which would constitute equivalents of pre-warnings (e.g. Bregman & McAllister, 1982; Dodd & Bradshaw, 1980; Lampinen & Smith, 1995; Smith & Ellsworth, 1987), and are therefore not considered here.”
Misinformation Effects and the Suggestibility of Eyewitness Memory. (2013, background): “…are easily influenced by misinformation that is provided by a credible source, they will effectively resist suggestion that is provided by a source who lacks credibility or whom they perceive as having intentions to mislead (Dodd & Bradshaw, 1980; Smith & Ellsworth, 1987; Underwood & Pezdek, 1998).”