The Surprisingly Limited Malleability of Implicit Racial Evaluations

By Jennifer A. Joy-Gaba, Brian A. Nosek. 2010

116 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b7d7ca71e125904d0ef49e7119fdb5b85aa04a82

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Social Psychology

1. Suzanne R Horwitz
2. Jordan R. Axt
3. John F. Dovidio
4. S. Gaertner
5. M. Hogg
6. Miles Hewstone
7. David M. Amodio

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Suzanne R Horwitz
2. Jordan R. Axt
3. John F. Dovidio
4. S. Gaertner
5. M. Hogg
6. Adam M. Grant
7. David M. Amodio
8. Adam R. Pearson

Citations in the corpus

• The rich—love them or hate them? Divergent implicit and explicit attitudes toward the wealthy (2017, background): “…or negative exemplars from a social group (Dasgupta & Greenwald, 2001), these effects may not be particularly robust across experimental variations (Joy-Gaba & Nosek, 2010) and our participants were exposed to merely “slight wrongdoing” about both groups in question, rather than just one group.”
• The Best Way to Measure Explicit Racial Attitudes Is to Ask About Them (2018, result): “…data came exclusively from online participants, and results may have differed with in-lab samples; participants may have felt greater social desirability concerns or expressed different levels of implicit or explicit racial attitudes in a lab context (e.g., Joy-Gaba & Nosek, 2010, study 3).”