Ideology and lay theories of stigma: The justification of stigmatization.

By C. Crandall. 2000

117 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/624b2b5b40ed028a712fe0e3a7cb14acf8e1d88b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

A justification-suppression model of the expression and experience of prejudice. (2003, background): “To test the idea that prejudice expression can be pleasurable, O’Brien and Crandall (2000) had students freely express negative thoughts about either a suppressed prejudice (against fat people), a nonsuppressed prejudice (against child abusers or Iraqi soldiers), or a negative topic unrelated to…”
Identity Dynamics in Occupational Dirty Work: Integrating Social Identity and System Justification Perspectives (2006, background): “Hence, even though the work may fulfill a necessary function in society, individuals are blamed for entering and continuing with stigmatized work (Crandall 2000).”
Psychosocial origins of obesity stigma: toward changing a powerful and pervasive bias (2003, background): “Crandall labels these attributions as ‘justification ideologies’, which represent untested beliefs that promote and justify stigma while also removing feelings of guilt for discriminatory behaviour and biased attitudes (61).”
Social norms and the expression and suppression of prejudice: the struggle for internalization. (2002, unknown): “The justifications of the prejudice against Nazis are widely accepted; the justifications of the prejudice against Blacks are not (for discussions of the justification of prejudice, see Crandall, 2000; Crandall & Eshleman, 2000).”
Heterosexual Allies: A Descriptive Profile (2010, background): “Studies indicate that when a stigmatizing characteristic is viewed as controllable, the stigmatized individual is held responsible for that characteristic and is more likely to be disliked and rejected (Crandall, 2000; Weiner, Perry, & Magnusson, 1988).”
Organizations Behaving Badly: When Are Discreditable Actions Likely to Damage Organizational Reputation? (2010, background): “People can justify the greater stigma because the stigmatized entity could have avoided the condition but chose not to (Crandall, 2000).”
Exposure to benevolent sexism and complementary gender stereotypes: consequences for specific and diffuse forms of system justification. (2005, background): “, Devine, 1989; Greenwald & Banaji, 1995; Kray et al., 2001; Steele, 1997; Wheeler & Petty, 2001). It seems that once stereotypic associations are sufficiently dispersed in the population of ideas, it is necessary only to temporarily activate them in order to evoke their social and psychological con”