Sex differences in processing speed: Developmental effects in males and females
By S. Camarata, R. Woodcock. 2006
217 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Genetics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/623ee1559b2453a0b06d439dd11ecf09b2e5dc25
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Cognitive Neuroscience
- J. Fearrington
- J. Below
- A. Kaufman
- Christopher H. Skinner
- Matthew R. Reynolds
- Caroline Scheiber
- Daniel B. Hajovsky
- C. A. Sorrell
In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Matthew R. Reynolds
- A. Kaufman
- K. McGrew
- J. Fearrington
- J. Below
- Christopher H. Skinner
- Caroline Scheiber
- Daniel B. Hajovsky
In Genetics
- J. Fearrington
- J. Below
- A. Kaufman
- Christopher H. Skinner
- Matthew R. Reynolds
- Caroline Scheiber
- Daniel B. Hajovsky
- C. A. Sorrell
Citations in the corpus
- CHC theory and the human cognitive abilities project: Standing on the shoulders of the giants of psychometric intelligence research (2009, background): “…include studies of the g-saturation of broad abilities (Arendasy, Hergovich & Sommer, in press), gender differences in CHC broad abilities (Camarata & Woodcock, 2006; Keith, Reynolds, Patel & Ridley, in press), the importance of broad abilities–above and beyond the influence of g–in the…”
- Gender Differences in Early Literacy: Analysis of Kindergarten through Fifth-Grade Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills Probes (2010, methodology): “As current results contradicted earlier findings, which suggested that reading skill differences grow larger as reading skills develop (e.g., Camarata & Woodcock, 2006; Chatterji, 2006; Gates, 1961; Klecker, 2006), future researchers should address external validity limitations using larger,…”
- Gender differences in achievement in a large, nationally representative sample of children and adolescents. (2015, methodology): “Females also show a clear advantage in processing speed abilities (Camarata & Woodcock, 2006), and processing speed abilities have been shown to predict writing skills (Floyd, McGrew, & Evans, 2008).”