Deservingness and emotions: Applying the structural model of deservingness to the analysis of affective reactions to outcomes
By Norman T. Feather. 2006
201 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/62227678ba8fa7b3a6138f615b01ddb169a016bd
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Cognitive Neuroscience
- T. Okimoto
- Michael Wenzel
- David C. Wilson
- D. Davis
- Anna Baumert
- Sebastian Lotz
- Thomas Schlösser
- F. Gresser
In Social Psychology
- David J. Y. Combs
- Richard H. Smith
- Heather J. Smith
- T. Okimoto
- David C. Wilson
- D. Davis
- Michael Wenzel
- Emiliana R. Simon-Thomas
In Sociology and Political Science
- T. Okimoto
- Michael Wenzel
- T. Pettigrew
- M. Petersen
- Sebastian Lotz
- Thomas Schlösser
- Heather J. Smith
- David C. Wilson
Citations in the corpus
- Individual differences in third-party interventions: How justice sensitivity shapes altruistic punishment (2011, background): “Moral outrage has been shown to determine retributive responses to norm violations, such as retaliation, punishment, and aggression (e.g., Averill, 1982; Barclay et al., 2005; Feather, 2006; Skitka, 2002).”
- Because I (Don't) Deserve It: How Relationship Reminders and Deservingness Influence Consumer Indulgence (2014, unknown): “Further- more, those experiencing certain, discrete emotions (e.g., guilt) also tend to experience less deservingness (Feather 2006; Feather and McKee 2009; Feather, McKee, and Bekker 2011).”
- Beyond Retribution: Conceptualizing Restorative Justice and Exploring its Determinants (2009, background): “Numerous researchers have discussed the concept of moral outrage as a common emotional response to injustice ( Feather, 2006; Mikula, 1986; Mikula, Scherer, & Athenstaedt, 1998), and have suggested that moral outrage is likely to elicit retaliatory responses, aggression, and revenge against offende”
- Deservingness versus values in public opinion on welfare: The automaticity of the deservingness heuristic (2011, background): “Judged by these criteria, the deservingness heuristic does indeed seem to be automatic (see also Feather 2006; Weiner 1995).”
- Compassion: An Evolutionary Analysis and Empirical Review (2010, background): “…emotional state or condition and that involves feelings of concern and sorrow for the other person” (see also Darwin, 1871/2004; Eisenberg et al., 2007; Feather, 2006; Jennifer L. Goetz, Dacher Keltner, and Emiliana Simon-Thomas, Department of Psychology, University of California, Berkeley.”
- The joy of pain and the pain of joy: In-group identification predicts schadenfreude and gluckschmerz following rival groups’ fortunes (2015, background): “People seen as responsible for their misfortunes, for example, are also seen as deserving their misfortunes, which then leads to schadenfreude in observers (e.g., Feather 2006; Van Dijk et al. 2005, 2008).”
- Reexamining Racial Resentment: Conceptualization and Content (2011, background): “While resent? ment can emanate from a variety of sources, it departs from simple envy or jealousy by including a sense of injustice originating from judgments about the deserving ness of some other individual or group (Feather 2006; Feather and Sherman 2002).”
- Relative Deprivation (2012, background): “Although we recognize that anger does not always indicate injustice (O’Mara, Jackson, Batson, & Gaertner, 2011), it is the emotion most clearly associated with justice violations (see Feather, 2006).”