Infants’ responsiveness to the auditory and visual attributes of a sounding/moving stimulus
By David J. Lewkowicz. 1992
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- David J. Lewkowicz
- Lorraine E. Bahrick
- R. Lickliter
- Ryan Sowinski
- Christian Scheier
- S. Place
- A. Walker-Andrews
- Ross A. Flom
Citations in the corpus
- Early Experience & Multisensory Perceptual Narrowing (2014, background): “…young (3–4 months old) infants can perceive the synchronous relations between moving objects and the sounds that they produce (Bahrick, 1988; Lewkowicz, 1992a,b, 1994b, 1996), by this age they begin to perceive the specific composition of the objects that make up such audiovisual events as…”
- Infant perception of audio-visual speech synchrony. (2010, background): “For example, studies have shown that infants can perceive the temporal synchrony between the audible and visible attributes of multisensory objects regardless of whether these are static/sounding objects (Lewkowicz, 1986), moving/sounding objects (Bahrick, 1988; Lewkowicz, 1992a, 1992b, 1996b; Sch”
- The Audio-Visual Temporal Binding Window Narrows In Early Childhood (2013, unknown): “In addition, studies have found that audiovisual redundancy enhances speech comprehension in adults (Sumby & Pollack, 1954; Summerfield, 1979) and that it affects discriminative responsiveness and learning in infants (Bahrick & Lickliter, 2000; Lewkowicz, 1985, 1986, 1992).”
- Sound induces perceptual reorganization of an ambiguous motion display in human infants (2003, background): “For example, although studies by Lewkowicz (1992a, 1992b, 1996) and Spelke, Born and Chu (1983) have shown that infants as young as 4 months of age are sensitive to audio-visual spatiotemporal relations inherent in events consisting of a single moving object and a simple sound, they also show how ”
- Infants' perception of expressive behaviors: differentiation of multimodal information. (1997, background): “Lewkowicz has examined the auditory dominance hypothesis with respect to dynamic stimuli (Lewkowicz, 1992) and faces and voices (Lewkowicz, 1996; Lewkowicz & Edmondson, 1993), leading to a change in the original proposal.”
- Infants' perception of the audible, visible, and bimodal attributes of multimodal syllables. (2000, background): “This is the case for studies of infants’ responsiveness to the auditory component of an auditory/visual compound stimulus ( Lewkowicz, 1988a, 1988b, 1992b, 1996a ), as well as for studies of infants’ responsiveness to an auditory stimulus alone (Jusczyk & Kemler Nelson, 1996).”
- The decline of cross-species intersensory perception in human infants: underlying mechanisms and its developmental persistence. (2008, background): “This finding is also in line with a body of evidence indicating that young infants are sensitive to audio-visual temporal synchrony relationsinspeechandinnon-speech events( Lewkowicz, 1992b, 1996, 2000b, 2003 ), that they prefer synchronous over asynchronous audio-visual speech (Dodd, 1979), that th”
- The development of infant intersensory perception: advantages of a comparative convergent-operations approach. (2000, background): “In a series of related studies, Lewkowicz (1988a, 1988b, 1992, 1996a) has shown that regard- LICKLITER AND BAHRICK less of the specific nature of the information specifying multimodal stimulation (e.g., flashing checkerboards and pure tones, moving objects and punctate sounds, human faces and…”