The archeology of knowledge

By M. Foucault. 1995

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

How Do We Justify Knowledge Produced Within Interpretive Approaches? (2005, unknown): “…(1900-1901/1970), Heidegger (1927/1981), Merleau-Ponty (1945/1962), and Gadamer (1960/1994) and then later by a series of other researchers such as Schutz (1945, 1953), Berger and Luckmann (1966), Foucault (1972), Derrida (1967/1978), Bourdieu (1990), Giddens (1984, 1993), and Searle (1995).”
Agency and Institutions: A Review on Institutional Entrepreneurship (2009, background): “(2004) suggest that institutional entrepreneurs in emerging organizational fields tend to be actors whose “subject positions” (Bourdieu, 1990; Foucault, 1972) provide them with both legitimacy in the eyes of diverse stakeholders and the ability to bridge those stakeholders, enabling them to access d”
Improving science education : the contribution of research (2000, background): “It is this refusal to turn documents into monuments (Foucault 1972) that makes this volume attractive.”
Bilingualism, gender, and ideology (2001, background): “…produced and seen from an “objective” position or from nowhere in particular, “discourse” as “practices which form the objects of which they speak” (Foucault, 1972, p. 49) involves human beings as agents operating in specific contexts, and, thus, brings back the relativist view of the…”