Developing a measure of interdisciplinary competence

By Lisa R. Lattuca, David B. Knight, Inger Bergom. 2012

93 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Biomedical Engineering, Education, Information Systems and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/60b520de819f8d7fd1a64ee57980d759ae9a9f48

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Biomedical Engineering

1. Mirjam Braßler
2. Jan Dettmers
3. Miles MacLeod
4. J. T. van der Veen

In Education

1. Mirjam Braßler
2. Jan Dettmers
3. Miles MacLeod
4. J. T. van der Veen

In Information Systems and Management

1. Mirjam Braßler
2. Jan Dettmers
3. Miles MacLeod
4. J. T. van der Veen

Citations in the corpus

• Enhancing the Effectiveness of Team Science (2015, background): “Interdisciplinary education has grown rapidly over the past four decades (Lattuca et al., 2013).”
• Scaffolding interdisciplinary project-based learning: a case study (2019, background): “The complexity of these problems is such that team effort is required as well as the integration of knowledge from different domains and the application of different engineering practices (Lansu et al. 2013; Lattuca, Knight, and Bergom 2013).”
• How to Enhance Interdisciplinary Competence—Interdisciplinary Problem-Based Learning versus Interdisciplinary Project-Based Learning (2017, methodology): “Addressing possible limitations to construct validity, Lattuca et al. (2013) indicate that the interdisciplinary competence scale might not fully describe the construct since their research is based on literature on interdisciplinarity that was more speculative than empirical.”