The implications on willingness to pay of respondents ignoring specific attributes

By David A. Hensher, John M. Rose, William H. Greene. 2004

412 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Transportation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5ff6b10ce89ec749f753cb96d0940d876dded66c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Transportation

Citations in the corpus

Visual Attention and Attribute Attendance in Multi-Attribute Choice Experiments (2015, background): “(e.g., Hensher et al., 2005, Scarpa et al., 2010, and Balcombe et al., 2011).”
Attention and choice: a review on eye movements in decision making. (2013, methodology): “These introduce either attributenonattendance, thereby relaxing the assumptionof full information integration (Hensher et al., 2005; Scarpa et al., 2013) and allowing a mix of different decision rules (Hensher, 2010; Hess, Rose, & Polak, 2010) and choice uncertainty (Balcombe & Fraser, 2011;…”
Non-attendance to attributes in environmental choice analysis: a latent class specification (2011, methodology): “…specific category of processing strategies or heuristics, namely attribute non-attendance, where a given attribute and its associated level are ignored by a respondent when evaluating alternative attribute packages (see Hensher et al. 2005a, Campbell et al. 2008, Hensher 2008, Scarpa et al. 2009).”
Attending to the Reasons for Attribute Non-attendance in Choice Experiments (2011, background): “…on unveiling how respondents process attributes, and in particular how attribute non-attendance affects results and how it should be accounted for in CE surveys (e.g. Scarpa et al. 2010; Hensher et al. 2005a; Campbell et al. 2008; Carlsson et al. 2010; Kaye-blake et al. 2009; Scarpa et al. 2009).”
Incorporating Discontinuous Preferences into the Analysis of Discrete Choice Experiments (2008, methodology): “…the environment should be protected irrespective of cost (Spash and Hanley, 1995), asking respondents about their ‘environmental dispositions’ (Rosenberger et al., 2003), and asking respondents to state the attributes they attended to during the experiment (Hensher, in press; Hensher et al., 2005).”
Stated and inferred attribute non-attendance in a design of designs approach (2014, methodology): “However, independent of the modelling approach almost all studies find that accounting for ANA improves model fit, indicating that respondents have indeed applied different processing strategies (Hensher et al., 2005; Hess and Hensher, 2010; Scarpa et al., 2013).”
Non-attendance and dual processing of common-metric attributes in choice analysis: a latent class specification (2010, background): “The first is attribute non-attendance, where a specific attribute and its associated level are ignored by a respondent when evaluating alternative attribute packages (see Hensher et al. 2005, Scarpa et al. 2008, Hensher 2008a).”
It’s not that I don’t care, I just don’t care very much: confounding between attribute non-attendance and taste heterogeneity (2013, background): “Analysts have focussed on why non-attendance occurs (e.g. Alemu et al., 2011; Cameron and DeShazo, 2011), how it can be accommodated in our models (e.g. Hess and Rose, 2007) and what its impacts are on model results (e.g. Hensher et al., 2005).”