Reasoning

By M. Longair, Serge Monnot, F. Deborah. 2019

2,027 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Prompting & Reasoning

Citations in the corpus

A Simple Method for Commonsense Reasoning (2018, neutral): “0 % USSM + Cause-Effect + WordNet [35] + ConceptNet [36] Knowledge Bases 56.”
Reasoning Like Program Executors (2022, background): “Reasoning is the process where deduction and in188 duction are sensibly applied to draw conclusion 189 from premises or facts (Scriven, 1976).”
VQA: Visual Question Answering (2015, background): “However, it includes as building blocks several components that the CV, NLP, and KR [4, 6, 25, 29, 3] communities have made significant progress on during the past few decades.”
ConceptNet 5.5: An Open Multilingual Graph of General Knowledge (2016, background): “Its knowledge is collected from many sources that include expertcreated resources, crowd-sourcing, and games with a purpose.”
The psychology of inferring conditionals from disjunctions: A probabilistic study (2012, background): “Psychologists have also investigated what they have called the defective truth table (Evans and Over, 2004, Ch. 3; Wason, 1966).”
Intuition and Reasoning: A Dual-Process Perspective (2010, methodology): “Wason (1966) also devised a reasoning problem, known as the four card selection task, which was intensively studied for the next 30 years or so.”
TransOMCS: From Linguistic Graphs to Commonsense Knowledge (2020, methodology): “Following conventional approaches [Saito et al. , 2018; Bosselut et al. , 2019], we consider only the relations covered by the original OMCS project [Liu and Singh, 2004], except those with vague meanings (i.e., ‘RelatedTo’) or those well-acquired by other knowledge resources (i.e., ‘IsA’ 2 ).”
Thinking Critically about Critical Thinking (2012, neutral): “(Kirwan, 1995, p. 749) Moreover, because it is a matter of objective fact whether one statement evidentially supports another, we can develop a science of sound reasoning, wherein there are various argument patterns in accordance with good reasoning, and others—fallacies—which are not.”
Empath: Understanding Topic Signals in Large-Scale Text (2016, methodology): “Existing databases of linguistic and commonsense knowledge provide networks of facts that computers should know about the world [21, 25, 9].”
Commonsense Knowledge Enhanced Embeddings for Solving Pronoun Disambiguation Problems in Winograd Schema Challenge (2016, methodology): “After training KEE models on a large Wikipedia corpus under the supervision of various commonsense knowledge bases, including ConceptNet[8], WordNet, and CauseCom, this paper proposes to represent all the pronouns and candidate mentions in the PDP problems by composing their contexts based on the pr”
Assessing miserly information processing: An expansion of the Cognitive Reflection Test (2014, methodology): “One non-deontic, abstract version was originally used by Wason (1966), and has been studied extensively in the reasoning literature.”
Heuristics and Biases as Measures of Critical Thinking: Associations with Cognitive Ability and Thinking Dispositions (2008, positive): “Originally used by Wason (1966), the selection task has been studied extensively in the reasoning literature (e.g., Evans, Newstead, & Byrne, 1993; Evans & Over, 1996; Johnson-Laird, 1999).”
Machine Common Sense Concept Paper (2018, background): “Several other systems have used crowdsourcing to acquire knowledge from the general public via the Web, such as OpenMind [21] and ConceptNet [22].”
The heuristic-analytic theory of reasoning: Extension and evaluation (2006, background): “Many psychologists would argue that the Wason selection task (Wason, 1966) has been greatly overresearched and is, in any case, a poor test of deductive reasoning.”
Experts Collaboration Learning for Continual Multi-Modal Reasoning (2023, result): “the same time, as shown by previous studies [24], [25].”
Exploring the Latent Structure of Strength‐related Attitude Attributes (2006, positive): “To explore this idea, Visser et al. (2004) used a modified version of the Wason (1966, 1968) selection task.”