A Simple Method for Commonsense Reasoning

By Trieu H. Trinh, Quoc V. Le. 2018

469 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Commonsense reasoning is a long-standing challenge for deep learning. For example, it is difficult to use neural networks to tackle the Winograd Schema dataset (Levesque et al., 2011). In this paper, we present a simple method for commonsense reasoning with neural networks, using unsupervised learning. Key to our method is the use of language models, trained on a massive amount of unlabled data, to score multiple choice questions posed by commonsense reasoning tests. On both Pronoun Disambiguation and Winograd Schema challenges, our models outperform previous state-of-the-art methods by a large margin, without using expensive annotated knowledge bases or hand-engineered features. We train an array of large RNN language models that operate at word or character level on LM-1-Billion, CommonCrawl, SQuAD, Gutenberg Books, and a customized corpus for this task and show that diversity of training data plays an important role in test performance. Further analysis also shows that our system successfully discovers important features of the context that decide the correct answer, indicating a good grasp of commonsense knowledge.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Natural Language Processing

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

  1. Luke S. Zettlemoyer
  2. Mohit Bansal
  3. Yejin Choi
  4. Jianfeng Gao
  5. Graham Neubig
  6. Hannaneh Hajishirzi
  7. Noah A. Smith
  8. Percy Liang

In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

  1. Jianfeng Gao
  2. Mohit Bansal
  3. Luc Van Gool
  4. Dacheng Tao
  5. Trevor Darrell
  6. Xiaogang Wang
  7. Ming-Hsuan Yang
  8. Cordelia Schmid

In Natural Language Processing

  1. Yejin Choi
  2. Mohit Bansal
  3. Luke S. Zettlemoyer
  4. Graham Neubig
  5. Jianfeng Gao
  6. Hannaneh Hajishirzi
  7. Caiming Xiong
  8. Noah A. Smith

Citations in the corpus