Secondary students' interpretations of photosynthesis and plant nutrition

By Esra Özay, H. Öztaş. 2003

138 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Education, General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5d435a0ea235f7095c5adb6318527700e00baec4

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Education

1. J. Fanèovièová
2. Billie Eilam
3. P. Prokop

In General Agricultural and Biological Sciences

1. Billie Eilam
2. P. Prokop

In Social Psychology

1. Billie Eilam
2. P. Prokop

Citations in the corpus

• STUDENTS' IDEAS ABOUT THE HUMAN BODY: DO THEY REALLY DRAW WHAT THEY KNOW? (2006, background): “Written tests with open-ended questions may more effectively elicit students’ in-depth thinking, but they are difficult to quantify and some times subjective (Özay & Öztas, 2003).”
• System thinking and feeding relations: learning with a live ecosystem model (2012, background): “Students often misperceive plants’ and animals’ feeding as similar while ignoring photosynthesis, thus revealing erroneous ontologies (Ozay and Oztas 2003).”