Do People Mix at Mixers? Structure, Homophily, and the “Life of the Party”

By Paul Ingram, Michael W. Morris. 2007

185 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Communication, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5cedb802a0ebc91b04c334262a9aa5e7df9e473c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Communication

1. Daniel A. McFarland
2. Linus Dahlander

In Statistical and Nonlinear Physics

1. Linus Dahlander
2. Daniel A. McFarland

In Strategy and Management

1. Daniel A. McFarland
2. Linus Dahlander
3. Marcel Bogers
4. Joel West
5. H. Chesbrough
6. Marcus Holgersson
7. Eelko K. R. E. Huizingh
8. Wpm Wim Vanhaverbeke

Citations in the corpus

• Social network analysis: foundations and frontiers on advantage. (2013, unknown): “DISCLOSURE STATEMENT .”
• Discretion Within Constraint: Homophily and Structure in a Formal Organization (2012, unknown): “…confiding networks among adults (Marsden 1988); social support networks in the government (South et al. 1982); interaction networks among coreligionists (Fischer 1982); and co-founding networks among entrepreneurs (Ruef et al. 2003), to cite a few among myriad examples (cf. Ingram and Morris 2007).”
• Ties That Last (2013, background): “’’ But measuring value homophily has been inherently difficult (Ingram and Morris, 2007).”