Discretion Within Constraint: Homophily and Structure in a Formal Organization

By Adam M. Kleinbaum, Toby E. Stuart, Michael L. Tushman. Organ. Sci., 2012

330 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Gender Studies, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/71769fc3d79acd1a2034c9c00f5eae61a1689934

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Gender Studies

1. Mabel Abraham

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

1. Sameer B. Srivastava
2. Amir Goldberg
3. Mabel Abraham

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Sameer B. Srivastava
2. Christopher Potts
3. Amir Goldberg
4. Mabel Abraham

Citations in the corpus

• Fitting In or Standing Out? The Tradeoffs of Structural and Cultural Embeddedness (2015, methodology): “Prior research in this vein has used e-mail metadata (Kleinbaum et al. 2013; Kossinets and Watts 2009; Srivastava 2015) or the mapping of individuals to e-mail distribution lists within an organization (Liu, Srivastava, and Stuart 2016) to characterize different facets of individuals’ structural…”
• Gender-role Incongruity and Audience-based Gender Bias: An Examination of Networking among Entrepreneurs (2020, background): “It is typically difficult to observe such processes outside the lab, and studies examining exchange processes within networks typically rely on self-report network surveys (for an exception using e-mail data see Kleinbaum, Stuart, and Tushman, 2013; Srivastava, 2015).”