Evolution of R&D Capabilities: The Role of Knowledge Networks Within a Firm

By Atul Nerkar, Srikanth Paruchuri. Management Sciences, 2005

490 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5b6225439eddc975c14cc355eca1309ad921f5e2

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

Investor Perceptions of Financial Misconduct: The Heterogeneous Contamination of Bystander Firms (2015, background): “…instance, is it that more desirable characteristics or behaviors—such as CEO charisma (e.g., Fanelli & Misangyi, 2006) or firm innovativeness (e.g., Nerkar & Paruchuri, 2005; Paruchuri, 2010)—only work to elicit agentic attributions, and thus not lend to investors’ (more positive) generalizations…”
EMNE catch‐up strategies in the wind turbine industry: Is there a trade‐off between output and innovation capabilities? (2012, methodology): “Following the tradition in the technology and innovation management literature, we use patents as proxies for a firm’s innovation capabilities (Narin, Noma, and Perry, 1987; Griliches, 1990; Jaffe, Trajtenberg, and Henderson, 1993; Nerkar and Paruchuri, 2005).”
Home-Country Networks and Foreign Expansion (2016, unknown): “Because it captures affiliation with other high social status actors, it is a better measure of social status than alternative centrality measures (Jensen, 2003; Nerkar & Paruchuri, 2005; Podolny, 1993, 1994).”
Lighting the way or stealing the shine? An examination of the duality in star scientists' effects on firm innovative performance (2015, background): “Breadth in a star’s expertise may also increase the star’s centrality in the organization’s workflow (Nerkar & Paruchuri, 2005) and thus the desirability of the star as a role model in the firm.”
Intellectual Capital, Innovation and Performance: a Systematic Review of the Literature (2012, methodology): “From the perspective of the innovation process, based on a case study research in a large chemical firm, Nerkar & Paruchuri (2005) indicate that the position of individual inventors within intra-firm knowledge network affects the likelihood with which the knowledge produced by the individual is…”
Small Worlds and Regional Innovation (2007, unknown): “We agree with many of the arguments for the benefits of clustering but can cite alternative arguments for its detrimental (Burt 2004) and contingent (Nerkar and Paruchuri 2005, McEvily and Reagans 2005, Fleming et al. 2007a) effects as well.”
Theories of the Firm-Market Boundary (2011, unknown): “Nerkar & Paruchuri, 2005 ), new knowledge generation (e.”
Effects of Search Timing on Innovation: The Value of Not Being in Sync with Rivals (2008, background): “…more frequent and further away from what the firm already knows (Greve, 2003), yet firms typically search in exactly the opposite way—too little and too close (Helfat, 1994; Benner and Tushman, 2002; Nerkar and Paruchuri, 2005)—and need to find effective strategies to avoid such local tendencies.”
Throwing Good Money after Bad? Political and Institutional Influences on Sequential Decision Making in the Venture Capital Industry (2007, background): “It is therefore a better measure of status than alternative centrality measures, especially as it captures affiliation with other high-status actors (Podolny, 1993, 1994; Benjamin and Podolny, 1999; Sorenson and Stuart, 2001; Jensen, 2003; Nerkar and Paruchuri, 2005).”
Conceptualizing accelerated internationalization in the born global firm: A dynamic capabilities perspective (2007, background): “…often are critical in providing the type of information that contributes to lowering risk and uncertainty inherent in international operations, and they facilitate the acquisition of knowledge and the development of complementary resources (e.g. Nerkar & Paruchuri, 2005; Selnes & Sallis, 2003).”