Concept mapping as a follow-up strategy to learning from texts: what characterizes good and poor mappers?

By Tatjana S. Hilbert, Alexander Renkl. 2008

133 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5b5bdf85080443ab77a2d9aabfc9760fe0bb687a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

1. Claudia Leopold
2. Detlev Leutner
3. John Sweller

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

1. Claudia Leopold
2. Detlev Leutner
3. Elke Sumfleth
4. John Sweller

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. Claudia Leopold
2. Detlev Leutner
3. Elke Sumfleth
4. John Sweller

Citations in the corpus

• Learning with summaries: Effects of representation mode and type of learning activity on comprehension and transfer (2013, background): “They often do not accurately apply strategies, and in turn, strategy application does not affect learning outcomes (e.g., Garner, 1985; Hilbert & Renkl, 2008; Leutner, Leopold, & den Elzen-Rump, 2007; Mateos et al., 2008; Slotte & Lonka, 1999).”