National Intellectual Capital Index

By Nick Bontis. 2004

506 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5ad907b77f327315a6ad63a73e230ad9dd0f4386

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

Intellectual capital and business performance in the Portuguese banking industry (2008, background): “…sociological, political and managerial development ‘in a manner previously unknown and largely unforeseen’ (Petty and Guthrie, 2000), which turns intellectual capital into a prominent business research topic (Bontis, 1999; Serenko and Bontis, 2004), demanding a rigorous theoretical framework.”
A scientometric analysis of knowledge management and intellectual capital academic literature (1994-2008) (2010, methodology): “Some past studies have focused on national levels of intellectual capital development and have shown a positive link between human capital investment and financial wealth (Bontis, 2004).”
Smart city intellectual capital: an emerging view of territorial systems innovation management (2015, background): “…learning potential embedded in people is usually labelled as Human Capital; it is included as a key knowledge resource in almost all the NIC models (Bontis, 2004; Lin and Edvinsson, 2010; Andriessen and Stam, 2005; Weziack, 2007; López et al., 2011) and in all the CIC models considered (Edvinsson…”
Intellectual capital and performance in causal models: Evidence from the information technology industry in Taiwan (2005, methodology): “…between intellectual capital and business performance, we adopt the partial least squares (PLS) method, which is a variance-based structural equation modeling approach used in previous intellectual capital research studies (see Bontis, 1998, 2004; Bontis et al., 2000; Bontis and Fitz-enz, 2002).”
A multidimensional view of intellectual capital: the impact on organizational performance (2015, result): “On the whole, the findings are consistent with the existing literature regarding the role of foregoing three IC components plays in augmenting OP (Bontis, 1998, 2004; Bontis et al., 2000; Chen et al., 2005; Clarke et al., 2011; do Rosário Cabrita and Vaz, 2005; Edvinsson and Malone, 1997; Wang and…”
The IC‐dVAL approach (2003, background): “…IC initiatives have taken place at the national level (e.g. Sweden, Denmark, The Nordic Project, Israel), but also on a regional level (e.g. the United Nations initiative of benchmarking the Arab region (Bontis, 2002), or the Pacific Islands), with the support of the World Bank, in 1997.”
National intellectual capital: comparison of the Nordic countries (2008, background): “Bontis (2004) 7.”
The impact of intellectual capital on firm performance: a study of Indian firms listed in COSPI (2018, background): “IC is non-monetary and intangible in nature and adds immensely to value creation (Bontis, 2004; Youndt et al., 2004; Vishnu and Gupta, 2014).”
Knowledge management and measurement: a critical review (2013, background): “The subsequent growing interest in Knowledge Management (KM) has resulted in an exponential growth in KM publications over the last decade at a rate of almost 50 per cent per year (Bontis and Serenko, 2009; Serenko and Bontis, 2004; Zack, 1999).”
Intellectual capital and performance within the banking sector of Luxembourg and Belgium (2013, background): “However, a comprehensive review of the top global researchers and research institutions world-wide showed that Belgium was ranked 19th and Luxembourg 33rd for IC research productivity (Serenko and Bontis, 2004).”
Theoretical perspectives on intellectual capital: A backward look and a proposal for going forward (2011, background): “According to Bontis (2004), “the IC of a nation includes the hidden values of individuals, enterprises, institutions, communities and regions that are current and potential sources for wealth creation” (p. 14).”
Intellectual capital disclosure payback (2011, background): “In this context, IC assets are considered critical (Bontis et al., 1999; Petrick et al., 1999; Bontis et al., 2000; Eustace, 2000; Barney, 2001; Hitt et al., 2001; Grant, 2002; Bontis and Fitz-Enz, 2002; Mathews, 2003; Bontis, 2004).”