A scientometric analysis of knowledge management and intellectual capital academic literature (1994-2008)

321 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Intellectual Capital, Innovation and Performance: a Systematic Review of the Literature (2012, methodology): “Based on a multi-criteria analysis, this journal has been ranked and scored 2nd out of 20 journals in the field, by 223 distinguished active researchers in the field of Knowledge Management/Intellectual Capital according to recent study applying scientometric principles (Serenko et al., 2010).”
Knowledge management and measurement: a critical review (2013, background): “An extensive study of 2,175 journal articles revealed a significant drop in practitioners’ contributions to KM literature, from 33 per cent in 1998 to only 10 per cent in 2008 – and more shocking is that only 0.33 per cent of KM research involves field studies (Serenko et al., 2010).”
Global Research on Carbon Emissions: A Scientometric Review (2019, methodology): “Also, this scientific method has been adopted in several ways for capturing research knowledge such as bibliometric techniques [43,44,60]; content analysis [39]; literature review [41,68,69]; latent semantic analysis (LSA) [40,51]; and scientometric visualization with different software [45,70].”
Intellectual capital and performance within the banking sector of Luxembourg and Belgium (2013, background): “The academic field of IC has grown by leaps and bounds (Serenko and Bontis, 2009; Bontis and Serenko, 2009a; Serenko et al., 2010).”