Interparental Agreement on Internalizing, Externalizing, and Total Behavior Problems: A Meta-analysis

By A. Duhig, K. Renk, Monica Epstein, V. Phares. 2006

425 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Making Sense of Multiple Informants in Child and Adolescent Psychopathology (2007, background): “In meta-analyses, age emerges as a significant predictor of cross-informant discrepancy (Duhig et al., 2000).”
A Comprehensive Meta-Analysis of Triple P-Positive Parenting Program Using Hierarchical Linear Modeling: Effectiveness and Moderating Variables (2008, methodology): “And second, even if heterogeneity is accepted, the failure to account for uncertainty in the estimated variance can lead to unduly optimistic estimates of both the variance and the mean underlying effect (DuMouchel 1994).”
Comparison of Mothers', Fathers', and Teachers' Reports on Problem Behavior in 5- to 6-Year-Old Children (2004, background): “Although it is widely accepted that consistency between informants is higher for ratings for younger children (van der Ende, 1999), only a few studies focussed on the younger age groups, for instance by making a distinction between agreement in ratings for preschool and elementary school children (s”
Informant discrepancies in the assessment of childhood psychopathology: a critical review, theoretical framework, and recommendations for further study. (2005, positive): “A meta-analysis of interparental agreement found a negative relation between SES and mother–father agreement: Lower levels of mother–father agreement were found for low-SES parents when compared with middle-SES parents (Duhig et al., 2000).”