The impact of facilities on student choice of university

By I. Price, Fides Matzdorf, Louise Smith, Helen Agahi. 2003

506 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Social Psychology, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/59374a7a37278d2ba1138a877f86d546e45022cc

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

In Social Psychology

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

Examining student satisfaction with higher education services: using a new measurement tool (2010, background): “The importance of university facilities corroborates findings by Price et al. (2003) who already pointed to the importance of the infrastructure by showing that facilities have an important impact on student choice of institutions.”
The importance of university facilities for student satisfaction at a Norwegian University (2015, background): “Moreover, university facilities are important factors that influence students’ decisions when selecting an HEI (Price et al., 2003), as high quality facilities are found to have a major impact on learning (Lewis, 2000, Tanner, 2009).”
International students' decision‐making process (2006, unknown): “Price et al. (2003) have found that, when provided with a high standard, facilities are considered as a relevant factor in influencing the students’ selection of the institution where they will pursue their studies.”
University and course choice: Implications for positioning, recruitment and marketing (2006, background): “For example, applicants to undergraduate programmes in England consider the teaching reputation of universities as more important than their research profiles ( Price et al. , 2003”
EDUTOURISM: EXPLORING THE PUSH-PULL FACTORS IN SELECTING A UNIVERSITY (2011, background): “…with high standard facilities is considered as a relevant factor in influencing the students’ selection of the institution where they will pursue their studies (Price et al., 2003) Lastly, a positive institution image can strongly influence the decision to attend an educational higher institution.”
Specific remedy for specific problem: measuring service quality in South African higher education (2010, background): “Facilities at higher educational institutions can also influence its ability to attract quality research personnel (Maringe and Gibbs 2009), to create suitable learning environments and student perceptions of their learning experience (Price et al. 2003).”
Emerging education hubs: the case of Singapore (2011, unknown): “(see Price et al. 2003).”
Learning space preferences of higher education students (2016, background): “This result endorses the findings in the study by Price et al. [36] stating that quiet areas are one of the most relevant study facilities of universities.”
Evaluating student satisfaction of quality at international branch campuses (2015, background): “Arpan, Ranye, and Zivnuska (2003) and Price et al. (2003) found that commitment to academic excellence and the presence of academic and social facilities were key issues to a student’s decision and satisfaction with the universities.”
University choice: what do we know, what don’t we know and what do we still need to find out? (2015, unknown): “location (Price et al., 2003).”
Putting student evaluations into perspective: The Course Experience Quality and Satisfaction Model (CEQS) (2012, unknown): “…et al., 2003; McInnis et al., 2001; Sheridan, 1995) to provide a complete picture of a student’s HE experience (e.g., availability of computers, library facilities) (Douglas et al., 2006; Price et al., 2003) which limits clarity of the actual factors contributing to student perceptions of quality.”
The decision-making and changing behavioural dynamics of potential higher education students: the impacts of increasing tuition fees in England (2013, background): “2003 ), image and reputation of the institution (Isherwood 1991 ; Ivy 2001 ; Paulsen and St.”
Student residential satisfaction in research universities (2011, background): “However, Price et al. (2003) reveal that friend’s recommendations did not help in promoting new recruitments.”