Basic-level and superordinate-like categorical representations in early infancy.

By Gundeep Behl‐Chadha. 1996

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Word learning emerges from the interaction of online referent selection and slow associative learning (2012, background): “This too is not trivial, but again, by the middle of the 2nd year, children appear adept at it (Bauer, Dow, & Hertsgaard, 1995; Behl-Chadha, 1996; Mareschal & Tan, 2007).”
Does object naming aid 12-month-olds' formation of novel object categories? (2006, background): “Indeed, numerous studies have demonstrated that infants can form relatively broad categories, such as animals and vehicles, (e.g., Behl-Chada, 1996; Fulkerson & Haaf, 2003; Oakes & Spalding, 1997; Waxman & Markow, 1995) and a few have even shown that, under certain conditions, broader categories…”
Developing Object Concepts in Infancy: An Associative Learning Perspective (2008, background): “dogs) (Behl-Chadha, 1996; Quinn, 2004; Quinn et al., 1993; Mandler et al., 1991).”
Recognition, discrimination and categorization of smiling by 5‐month‐old infants (2003, unknown): “Behl-Chadha, 1996; Bomba & Siqueland, 1983; Bornstein & Arterberry, 1999; Bornstein, Kessen & Weiskopf, 1976; Eimas, Siqueland, Jusczyk & Vigorito, 1971; Quinn, 1999).”
Experience-Based and On-Line Categorization of Objects in Early Infancy (2010, background): “…with discriminable exemplars of a category, and they are then tested with novel exemplars from the familiar category and from a contrasting different category (e.g., Arterberry & Bornstein, 2002; Behl-Chadha, 1996; Bornstein, Kessen, & Weiskopf, 1976; Quinn, Eimas, & Rosenkrantz, 1993).”
The Emergence of Category Representations During Infancy: Are Separate Perceptual and Conceptual Processes Required? (2000, background): “However, Behl-Chadha (1996) demonstrated that young infants participating in the familiarization–novelty preference procedure likewise form global category representations, and Quinn and Johnson (1998) and Younger and Fearing (1998) more recently presented evidence for superiority of global over bas”
Perceptual and Conceptual Processes in Infancy (2000, methodology): “Again, these findings contrast with the work of Behl-Chadha (1996), in showing categorization at a global, domain level accompanied by the absence of subcategorization.”
Infants' use of object parts in early categorization. (1998, methodology): “In recent studies, Behl-Chadha and colleagues (Behl-Chada, 1996; Behl-Chadha, Eimas, & Quinn, 1995), using a paired-preference technique, have shown that 3- and 4-month-old infants can form categorical representations for mammals that exclude birds, fish, and furniture and that infants can form repr”
The global-to-basic level shift in infants’ categorical thinking: First evidence from a longitudinal study (2002, background): “Some studies suggest that infants as young as 3 to 4 months of age can form this type of category (Behl-Chadha, 1996; Quinn & Eimas, 1996, 1998).”
On the Birth and Growth of Concepts (2008, background): “Furniture appears to be undifferentiated in this age period; chairs, tables, and beds are not yet conceptual subcategories, although even threemonth-olds can differentiate them perceptually (Behl-Chadha, 1996).”
Semantic Cognition: A Parallel Distributed Processing Approach (2004, background): “Investigators who adopt this perspective emphasize studies of perceptual categorisation in infancy, which have convincingly demonstrated that by 3-4 months of age infants are sensitive to visual similarities among discriminably different stimulus items, and can employ these similarities to direct th”
Evidence for knowledge-based category discrimination in infancy. (2002, background): “Apparently, infants at this age can also form superordinatelike classes, such as mammals and furniture (Behl-Chadha, 1996).”