The Institutional Structuring of Innovation Strategies: Business Systems, Firm Types and Patterns of Technical Change in Different Market Economies

By R. Whitley. 2000

319 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Management of Technology and Innovation, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/588daff1129903426d03a8eb5c9018b9462c6952

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Management of Technology and Innovation

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

Exporting the German Model: The Establishment of a New Automobile Industry Cluster in Shanghai (2005, result): “This work, on “varieties of capitalism” (Hall and Soskice 2001) and “divergent capitalisms” or business systems (Whitley 1999, 2000), is in opposition to other views that claim that different national models are converging.”
“Low‐Tech” Innovations (2008, background): “In the process, the well-established technological development path is not left but often a remarkable flexibility is required as regards the restructuring of organizational routines (Whitley, 2000: 866).”
Converging or diverging? A comparative analysis of trends in contingent employment practice in Europe over a decade (2006, background): “Whitley (2000b) identifies six ideal types: fragmented, coordinated industrial districts, compartmentalised, coordinated, state organised and highly organised business systems.”
Understanding innovation in small and medium-sized enterprises: a process manifest (2005, background): “As Whitley (2000) argues, the innovation strategies adopted by firms will relate to the firm in the context of its existing customer base and institutional structures.”
Organizational Learning in Multinationals: R&D Networks of Japanese and US MNEs in the UK* (2003, background): “This kind of innovation system requires firms to develop highly flexible and permeable organizational structures to acquire knowledge from a wide variety of external sources (Hage and Hollingsworth, 2000; Whitley, 2000).”
The Logic of Funding European Pension Restructuring and the Dangers of Financialisation (2003, background): “…sectors, and economies to innovate, and that innovation is more a matter of having the right organisation than of having enough `dough' or `brainpower' (Whitley, 2000), it follows that the focus of policymakers ought to be not so much on factor mobility as on the conditions for collective learning.”
State capitalism(s) redux? Theories, tensions, controversies (2020, background): “For instance, Whitley (2000) identifies a ‘state-organized business system’, while Schmidt (2002) argued that ‘state capitalism’, epitomized by French dirigisme d’état, is a third European variety of capitalism alongside the coordinated-market economy (CME) and liberal-market economy (LME) ideal…”
Institutional Thickness Revisited (2017, background): “This leads not only to different strengths of associations and unions themselves but also to differences in the ways by which employee–employer relations, innovation, and control activities are organized at the firm level (Whitley 1998, 1999, 2000, 2005).”
Academic collaborations and firm innovation performance in China: : The role of region-specific institutions (2015, background): “…idiosyncrasies in IPR enforcement, international openness and the quality of academic talent in URIs influence the benefits and costs of academic collaborations as well as the search, transaction and transformation costs associated with identifying and using external knowledge (Whitley, 2000).”