A research agenda for social entrepreneurship
By H. Haugh. 2005
387 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Business and International Management, Finance, Management of Technology and Innovation
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5880708580d8b09e6b3fc4788dbb3bd0c2405494
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Business and International Management
- Jeffery S. McMullen
- D. Littlewood
- R. Seymour
- Kelly Hall
- Janina von der Weppen
- R. Millar
- Timothy J. Vogus
- J. Cochrane
In Finance
- Jeffery S. McMullen
- D. Littlewood
- Kelly Hall
- Janina von der Weppen
- R. Millar
- J. Cochrane
- Diane Holt
- Satyajit Majumdar
In Management of Technology and Innovation
- Jeffery S. McMullen
- Jennifer Ruskin
- D. Littlewood
- R. Seymour
- Kelly Hall
- Cynthia M. Webster
- Janina von der Weppen
- R. Millar
Citations in the corpus
- Social Entrepreneurship in South Africa: Exploring the Influence of Environment (2018, background): “The importance of the environment and its influence on new venture creation has long been recognized in wider entrepreneurship literature (Low & Macmillan, 1988), with calls for it to be given greater attention in social entrepreneurship research (Haugh, 2005).”
- Social enterprise as a socially rational business (2008, neutral): “Entrepreneurial and government arguments differ over whether the goal of social enterprise policy is the creation of a „not-for-profit‟ or a „more-than-profit‟ business movement (Haugh, 2005; Allen, 2005).”
- Why Create Value for Others? An Exploration of Social Entrepreneurial Motives (2016, background): “Despite several calls for research addressing why social entrepreneurs do what they do (Austin, Stevenson, and WeiSkillern 2006; Haugh 2005; Miller et al. 2012), surprisingly little empirical research to date investigates social entrepreneurial motivation.”
- The Case for a Socially Oriented Business Model Canvas: The Social Enterprise Model Canvas (2019, background): “SEs in terms of social values (Haugh 2005; Peattie and Morley 2008), the quantification or precise measurement of social impact remains rare (see Ormiston and Seymour 2011) and complicated, due to the nature of social phenomena, multi-causality of”
- Achieving Shared Triple Bottom Line (TBL) Value Creation: Toward a Social Resource-Based View (SRBV) of the Firm (2018, background): “…needed regarding the monitoring and measuring of impact, and the ability to define metrics and measures that drive the appropriate behavior is key (Haugh 2005), although there is significant debate regarding the appropriate economic, environmental and social metrics and measures (Haugh 2005;…”
- Mapping the Intellectual Structure of Social Entrepreneurship Research: A Citation/Co-citation Analysis (2019, neutral): “2010, 2011; Galera and Borzaga 2009; Haugh 2005; Mair and Marti 2006; Peredo and McLean 2006; Thompson 2008).”
- Social enterprises in tourism: an exploratory study of operational models and success factors (2012, background): “The landscape of social enterprise covers a wide spectrum of institutions, but increasing academic scrutiny has resulted in a consensus that the primary goal of any social enterprise is the adoption of financially sustainable strategies to achieve social aims (Haugh, 2005, p. 1).”
- Social enterprise and renewable energy: emerging initiatives and communities of practice (2008, background): “, 2007), a problem which is rather typical for SEs in general (Haugh, 2005).”
- Social entrepreneurship as an essentially contested concept: Opening a new avenue for systematic future research (2014, background): “…of social entrepreneurship is often associated with the idea of heightened efficiency and effectiveness through commercial activities (Nicholls, 2010), and the financial sustainability and self-sufficiency (Boschee and McClurg, 2003; Harding, 2004; Haugh, 2005) on the part of the SE organization.”
- Deconstructing the Way in which Value Is Created in the Context of Social Entrepreneurship (2018, neutral): “Many papers have offered a rich understanding of the distinctive role of values and value creation in the SE context (e.g. Agafonow 2014, 2015; Austin et al. 2006; Austin and Seitanidi 2012; Chell 2007; Dacin et al. 2011; Haugh 2005, 2007; Mair and Marti 2006; Santos 2012; Short et al. 2009).”
- Social Entrepreneurship in Non-munificent Institutional Environments and Implications for Institutional Work: Insights from China (2017, neutral): “Social entrepreneurship involves creating social enterprises, which are organizations that apply business models to address social issues (Dees 1998; Haugh 2005; Kistruck and Beamish 2010; Mair et al. 2006; Selsky and Parker 2010).”
- The Scientometrics of Social Entrepreneurship and Its Establishment as an Academic Field1 (2018, background): “A large number of reviews on social entrepreneurship have previously been published (e.g., Chell, Nicolopoulou and Karatas-€ Ozkan 2010; Certo and Miller 2008; Dacin, Dacin, and Matear 2010; Danko and Brunner 2010; Desa 2007; Douglas 2008; Galera and Borzaga 2009; Granados et al. 2011; Haugh 2005; J”
- Venturing for Others with Heart and Head: How Compassion Encourages Social Entrepreneurship (2012, background): “Social entrepreneurship typically emerges in contexts where markets are perceived to have failed (McMullen, 2011) or where there are significant institutional voids (Austin et al., 2006; Dart, 2004; Haugh, 2005; Mair & Marti, 2009; Seelos & Mair, 2005).”
- Personality trait differences between traditional and social entrepreneurs (2014, background): “Indeed, Mason (2012) highlights the “seemingly endless definitional debate amongst academics” as to the precise nature and definition of social entrepreneurship, and Haugh (2005) suggests that social entrepreneurship research has not been well served by the many terms and definitions adopted by rese”
- Social Return on Investment (SROI) and Performance Measurement (2013, background): “Evidently, there tends to be a lack of understanding about the business models they use (Department of Trade and Industry, 2002; Haugh, 2005).”