Parkin and PINK1 mitigate STING-induced inflammation

By Danielle A. Sliter, Jennifer Martinez, Ling Hao, Xi Chen, Nuo Sun, Tara D. Fischer, Jonathon L Burman, Yan Li, Zhe Zhang, Derek P. Narendra and 4 more. Nature, 2018

1,155 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Although serum from patients with Parkinson’s disease contains elevated levels of numerous pro-inflammatory cytokines including IL-6, TNF, IL-1β, and IFNγ, whether inflammation contributes to or is a consequence of neuronal loss remains unknown1. Mutations in parkin, an E3 ubiquitin ligase, and PINK1, a ubiquitin kinase, cause early onset Parkinson’s disease2,3. Both PINK1 and parkin function within the same biochemical pathway and remove damaged mitochondria from cells in culture and in animal models via mitophagy, a selective form of autophagy4. The in vivo role of mitophagy, however, is unclear, partly because mice that lack either PINK1 or parkin have no substantial Parkinson’s-disease-relevant phenotypes5–7. Mitochondrial stress can lead to the release of damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) that can activate innate immunity8–12, suggesting that mitophagy may mitigate inflammation. Here we report a strong inflammatory phenotype in both Prkn−/− and Pink1−/− mice following exhaustive exercise and in Prkn−/−;mutator mice, which accumulate mutations in mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA)13,14. Inflammation resulting from either exhaustive exercise or mtDNA mutation is completely rescued by concurrent loss of STING, a central regulator of the type I interferon response to cytosolic DNA15,16. The loss of dopaminergic neurons from the substantia nigra pars compacta and the motor defect observed in aged Prkn−/−;mutator mice are also rescued by loss of STING, suggesting that inflammation facilitates this phenotype. Humans with mono- and biallelic PRKN mutations also display elevated cytokines. These results support a role for PINK1- and parkin-mediated mitophagy in restraining innate immunity. Acute and chronic mitochondrial stress in mice require PINK1 and parkin to restrain STING-mediated innate immunity.

Subfields: Epidemiology, Immunology, Molecular Biology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/58599d3b78c731228a0419d1d05768a531a41174

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Epidemiology

  1. Guido Kroemer
  2. D. Tang
  3. R. Kang
  4. V. Deretic
  5. D. Klionsky
  6. Beth Levine
  7. Jiao Liu
  8. N. Mizushima

In Immunology

  1. Guido Kroemer
  2. R. Kang
  3. V. Deretic
  4. D. Tang
  5. L. Zitvogel

In Molecular Biology

  1. Guido Kroemer
  2. D. Tang
  3. R. Kang
  4. D. Klionsky
  5. Jiao Liu
  6. V. Deretic
  7. S. Masters
  8. Beth Levine

Citations in the corpus