A cognitive-behavioral model of pathological Internet use

By Richard A. Davis. Computers in Human Behavior, 2001

2,835 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Education, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/57998f6761d6b46fe47edf099b761b0c3e86ea10

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

1. Mark D. Griffiths
2. Joël Billieux
3. Halley M. Pontes
4. Vladan Starcevic
5. I. Elliott
6. D. A. Gentile
7. A. Beech
8. F. Aysan

In Education

1. Mark D. Griffiths
2. Scott E. Caplan
3. Joël Billieux
4. Daria J. Kuss
5. Halley M. Pontes
6. Kimberly S. Young
7. Robert LaRose
8. Laura Widyanto

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Mark D. Griffiths
2. Scott E. Caplan
3. Daria J. Kuss
4. Joël Billieux
5. Halley M. Pontes
6. Robert LaRose
7. Matthew S. Eastin
8. Dmitri Williams

Citations in the corpus

• Factor structure for Young's Internet Addiction Test: A confirmatory study (2008, methodology): “OCS (Davis, 2001) Diminished impulse control Loneliness/Depression Social comfort Distraction –”
• Beyond Excessive Use: The Interaction between Cognitive and Behavioral Symptoms of Problematic Internet Use (2006, background): “Although studies of the amount of Internet use do provide some insight into the etiology of PIU, we can further advance the understanding of PIU with more detailed examinations of cognitive predictors, such as motives for online activities and thoughts and feelings about using the Internet (Caplan, ”
• A Review of the Research on Internet Addiction (2005, background): “…Internet-related behaviors as Internet addiction (e.g., Chou and Hsiao, 2000; Young, 1996a), whereas others prefer Internet Addiction Disorder (Goldberg, 1996), Internet pathological use (e.g., Davis, 2001; Morahan- Martin and Schumacker, 2000), or Internet dependency (e.g., Scherer, 1997).”
• Evaluation of Internet Addiction and Depression among University Students (2013, background): “Healthy use of the internet is defined as the use of the internet to achieve a desired goal within an appropriate period of time without intellectual or behavioral discomfort (Davis, 2001).”
• A Social Skill Account of Problematic Internet Use (2005, background): “The next section explains the hypothesized influence of preference for online social interaction on maladaptive behavioral symptoms of PIU (see Caplan, 2002, 2003; Davis, 2001).”
• An Exploration of Problematic Smartphone Use among Chinese University Students: Associations with Academic Anxiety, Academic Procrastination, Self-Regulation and Subjective Wellbeing (2018, background): “Furthermore, theoretical approaches have also suggested an association between anxiety and PSU (Billieux 2012; Billieux et al. 2015a) and pathological Internet use (Davis 2001).”
• Excessive internet use by young Europeans: psychological vulnerability and digital literacy? (2020, background): “On the other hand, Davis (2001) shows that individuals with lower self-efficacy can use the Internet to regain a positive evaluation of their own abilities.”
• Does the construct of Internet addiction reflect a single entity or a spectrum of disorders (2017, background): “…with a lack of social support and/or social isolation and it was hypothesised that the manifestations of “pathology” would not exist in the absence of the Internet (Davis 2001), thus establishing a link between generalized pathological Internet use and “addiction to the Internet” (Griffiths 2000).”