The affective foundations of high-reliability organizing

By Timothy J. Vogus, Naomi B Rothman, Kathleen M. Sutcliffe, Karl E. Weick. 2014

97 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/56ed86c0e9cd273cb79f9bb472768255910115dc

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

1. Kathleen M. Sutcliffe
2. Dean A. Shepherd
3. T. Williams

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. T. Williams
2. Kathleen M. Sutcliffe
3. Dean A. Shepherd
4. David W. Williams
5. Matthew S. Wood
6. James C. Hayton
7. Jeffery S. McMullen
8. G. Cacciotti

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

1. T. Williams
2. Dean A. Shepherd
3. Daniel A. Gruber
4. Kathleen M. Sutcliffe
5. Holger Patzelt
6. Johan Wiklund
7. James C. Hayton
8. Melissa S. Cardon

Citations in the corpus

• Organizational response to adversity: Fusing crisis management and resilience research streams (2017, background): “Emotional ambivalence opens actors to alternative perspectives that can increase judgment accuracy (Rees, Rothman, Lehavy, & Sanchez-Burks, 2013), enhance cognitive flexibility (Fong, 2006), and assist in the anticipation of and preparation for the unexpected (Vogus et al., 2014).”
• Understanding The Dual Nature of Ambivalence: Why and When Ambivalence Leads to Good and Bad Outcomes (2017, unknown): “also collective or group adaptability (e.g., increasing mindful organizing; Vogus et al., 2014).”