Why prosocials exhibit greater cooperation than proselfs: the roles of social responsibility and reciprocity

By David de Cremer, P. V. van Lange. 2001

293 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/56a0e889714509e01ed0f71a8279de74ce3a4e4c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Social Psychology

1. Eric van Dijk
2. Daniel Balliet
3. J. Joireman
4. C. Parks
5. Michel J. J. Handgraaf
6. David de Cremer
7. D. van Knippenberg
8. Russell S. Cropanzano

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Daniel Balliet
2. J. Joireman
3. Eric van Dijk
4. C. Parks
5. David de Cremer
6. Michel J. J. Handgraaf
7. P. V. van Lange
8. D. van Knippenberg

Citations in the corpus

• Social Value Orientation and Cooperation in Social Dilemmas: A Meta-Analysis (2009, background): “This is important because expectations of non-cooperation are likely to reduce the cooperation of prosocials, but have little impact on the cooperation of proselfs (De Cremer & Van Lange, 2001), thereby reducing or eliminating the effect of SVO on cooperative behavior.”
• Social value orientations and the strategic use of fairness in ultimatum bargaining (2004, background): “That is, the prior research that stressed the responsiveness of pro-socials, was focused on their tendency to show behavioral assimilation (De Cremer & Van Lange, 2001; Van Lange, 1999): if they are confronted with cooperation, they tend to respond with cooperation, and if they are confronted with…”