Limitation of stomatal conductance by hydraulic traits: sensing or preventing xylem cavitation?

By A. Nardini, S. Salleo. Trees, 2000

340 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Global and Planetary Change, Mechanical Engineering, Plant Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5689d73d6f45a728076bd6e12529036540804eac

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Global and Planetary Change

In Mechanical Engineering

In Plant Science

Citations in the corpus

Changes in leaf hydraulic conductance during leaf shedding in seasonally dry tropical forest (2003, background): “In the few studies that have attempted to place the hydraulic properties of leaves within the context of the whole plant pathway, leaves account for between 40% and 80% of the whole-plant hydraulic resistance (Becker et al ., 1999; Nardini & Tyree, 2000; Brodribb et al ., 2002a).”
Carbon isotope discrimination and wood anatomy variations in mixed stands of Quercus robur and Quercus petraea (2001, background): “Different mechanisms directly coupling stomatal conductance to root-to-leaf conductance have been proposed (Sperry 2000; Nardini & Salleo 2000).”
Differentiation of leaf water flux and drought tolerance traits in hemiepiphytic and non-hemiepiphytic Ficus tree species (2010, positive): “%) of plant resistance (Nardini & Salleo 2000; Brodribb, Holbrook & Gutierrez 2002; Sack et al. 2003).”
Interrelations among pressure–volume curve traits across species and water availability gradients (2006, background): “2005) and the slope of this relationship varies with the terms that affect the remainder of the equation: overall site humidity and overall site soil moisture availability (Nardini and Salleo 2000; Sack et al. 2005).”
Diurnal depression of leaf hydraulic conductance in a tropical tree species (2004, positive): “Only recently has the vulnerability of leaf venation been investigated, and the results of these studies suggest that leaf xylem operates very close to its cavitation threshold (Nardini & Salleo 2000; Brodribb & Holbrook 2003a; Lo Gullo et al .”
Functional and Ecological Xylem Anatomy (2015, background): “Readers interested in this field are referred to Sperry et al. (1998), Hacke et al. (2000a), Nardini & Salleo (2000), and Sperry et al. (in press).”
Morphological traits and water use strategies in seedlings of Mediterranean coexisting species (2010, positive): “…thus increasing water absorption, which allows them to extract water from soil to support high leaf gas exchange rates (Levitt 1980; Lo Gullo and Salleo 1988) even if their stomatal behavior involves xylem cavitation and consequently loss of hydraulic conductance (Nardini and Salleo 2000).”
Hydraulic limitations imposed by crown placement determine final size and shape of Quercus rubra L. leaves (2004, background): “Because rates of water loss from leaves, to a first approximation, scale linearly with leaf area, leaf size will be constrained by the limits set by the cavitation thresholds within the vascular system (Nardini & Salleo 2000; Nardini, Tyree & Salleo 2001).”
The ‘hydrology’ of leaves: co‐ordination of structure and function in temperate woody species (2003, background): “…of previously reported correlations between branch (and wholeplant) hydraulic conductivities, stomatal dimensions, gmax, and mid-day rates of transpiration and photosynthesis per leaf area (Nardini & Salleo 2000; Aasamaa & Sober 2001; Aasamaa, Sober & Rahi 2001; Bhaskar et al. 2002; Meinzer 2002).”
Changes in leaf hydraulic conductance correlate with leaf vein embolism in Cercis siliquastrum L. (2003, background): “This “stomatal control of embolism” (Jones and Sutherland 1991) has been reported to occur in several woody species (Cochard et al. 1996; Nardini and Salleo 2000 ) and the hypothesis was advanced that stomatal response and xylem cavitation may be linked by a sort of negative feed back mechanism (Sa”
Reconciling the optimal and empirical approaches to modelling stomatal conductance (2011, background): “Furthermore, evidence is accumulating that photosynthetic capacity and maximal stomatal conductance are related to plant hydraulic architecture (e.g. Nardini & Salleo, 2000; Clearwater & Meinzer, 2001; Hubbard et al. 2001; Katul et al. 2003; Mencuccini, 2003; Bucci et al. 2005; Taylor & Eamus,…”
Hydraulic and photosynthetic co‐ordination in seasonally dry tropical forest trees (2002, background): “Hence we examined the interaction between g K Ds P= DY 1438 T. J. Brodribb et al. mean (KL DY) and mean ETR among species, assuming branch conductivity was uniformly scaled to whole-plant conductivity (Nardini & Salleo 2000).”
Hydraulic architecture of leaf blades: where is the main resistance? (2004, result): “(Fig. 2) which was in the same range as previously reported for the same species by Nardini (2001) and Nardini & Salleo (2000) .”
An overview of models of stomatal conductance at the leaf level. (2010, background): “…signals that trigger stomatal closure in response to a shift in the balance between evaporative demand and soil water availability (Saliendra, Sperry & Comstock 1995; Cochard, Breda & Granier 1996a; Comstock & Menuccini 1998; Nardini & Salleo 2000; Salleo et al. 2000; Christmann et al. 2007).”
Leaf hydraulics. (2006, background): “There is evidence of strong convergence in water relations parameters leaf, stem xylem, leaf, and soil during peak transpiration for plants of a given system in moist soil during the growing season (23, 24, 55, 80, 123).”