An overview of models of stomatal conductance at the leaf level.
By Gaëlle Damour, Thierry Simonneau, H. Cochard, L. Urban. Plant, Cell and Environment, 2010
696 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Global and Planetary Change, Plant Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d642da7deb274491059da13af64fa71c399ac9f8
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Global and Planetary Change
- John A. Kershaw
- R. Duursma
- Jerome K. Vanclay
- Aaron Weiskittel
- D. Hann
- Derek Eamus
- Todd Dawson
- M. Rietkerk
In Plant Science
- R. Duursma
- Jerome K. Vanclay
- Aaron Weiskittel
- D. Ellsworth
- John A. Kershaw
- Todd Dawson
- M. Rietkerk
- B. Medlyn
Citations in the corpus
- Reconciling the optimal and empirical approaches to modelling stomatal conductance (2011, background): “For example, a recent compendium of stomatal models listed 35 alternative models, but did not include any derived from optimal stomatal theory (Damour et al., 2010).”
- Root Water Uptake: From Three‐Dimensional Biophysical Processes to Macroscopic Modeling Approaches (2013, neutral): “…is no consensus among biologists on how environmental stimuli are sensed and transduced into the plant and eventually trigger stomatal response (Damour et al., 2010). he response to soil water deicit has been shown to be mediated directly through hydraulic signals transduced in the shoot…”
- Forest Growth and Yield Modeling (2011, methodology): “Damour et al. (2010) illustrated an approach for combining stomatal conductance models developed for well-watered conditions with ones designed specifically for drought conditions,which should be further incorporated in future processmodels.”
- Ecohydrological advances and applications in plant-water relations research: a review (2011, background): “However, this threshold–response relationship varies markedly among species and ecosystems due to different adaptive strategies and physiological mechanisms that regulate stomatal functions (Sperry et al. 2002; Damour et al. 2010; Zweifel et al. 2007).”
- The optimal stomatal response to atmospheric CO2 concentration: Alternative solutions, alternative interpretations (2013, positive): “Stoatal conductance is therefore of fundamental importance in plant cosystem function and land surface behaviour, and considerable ffort has been devoted to developing good model representations f stomatal conductance (Berry et al., 2010; Damour et al., 2010).”
- Climate uncertainty on leaf surfaces: the biophysics of leaf microclimates and their consequences for leaf‐dwelling organisms (2012, background): “Indeed, stomatal opening reflects both exogenous (environmental fluctuations) and endogenous (plant ecophysiological status) factors (Damour et al. 2010).”
- Alternatives to Sedum on green roofs: Can broad leaf perennial plants offer better ‘cooling service’? (2013, neutral): “Many urban climate models tend to represent vegetation very simply (see [42]) or define it in 509 broad terms; ‘grass’ / ‘trees’ with little precision based on species, albedo characteristics or 510 indeed the impacts of a range of environmental factors that influence stomatal behaviour 511 either d”
- A Dynamic Optimality Principle for Water Use Strategies Explains Isohydric to Anisohydric Plant Responses to Drought (2018, background): “Numerous models for stomatal kinetics have emerged over the past century or so (for an overview see e.g., Jarvis, 1976; Collatz et al., 1991; Leuning, 1995; Damour et al., 2010; Way et al., 2011).”
- Modeling plant–water interactions: an ecohydrological overview from the cell to the global scale (2016, neutral): “Models have been presented to mechanistically describe stomatal behavior and reproduce the hydraulic dynamics in the leaf or simply to reproduce functional relations in agreement with observations.(80,109,110) Models that represent the exact mechanisms through which stomata respond to 1”