Reconciling the optimal and empirical approaches to modelling stomatal conductance

By B. Medlyn, R. Duursma, Derek Eamus, D. Ellsworth, I. C. Prentice, C. Barton, K. Crous, P. de Angelis, Michael K. Freeman, L. Wingate. 2011

1,219 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Global and Planetary Change, Plant Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ca6c58df68c5bcbf9e98dbd7d291f1e1b0481ef1

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Global and Planetary Change

1. I. Wright
2. Gordon Bonan
3. U. Niinemets
4. Peter B. Reich
5. R. Fisher
6. R. Duursma
7. Alejandro Ordonez
8. B. Medlyn

In Plant Science

1. Gordon Bonan
2. U. Niinemets
3. R. Duursma
4. Peter B. Reich
5. B. Medlyn
6. I. Wright
7. D. Lawrence
8. William R. Wieder

Citations in the corpus

• Plant responses to rising vapor pressure deficit. (2020, neutral): “6, blue dashed; (Medlyn et al. 2011).”
• The world‐wide ‘fast–slow’ plant economics spectrum: a traits manifesto (2014, background): “It is narrower in the range of traits focused on (as it ignores height and seeds), but fuller in its exploration of traits directly involved in resource economics.”
• Reliable, robust and realistic: the three R's of next-generation land-surface modelling (2014, methodology): “The closure schemes used to predict stomatal conductance at the leaf level have remained largely empirical, but Medlyn et al. (2011) showed how all of the commonly15 used expressions (including the Ball-Berry, Leuning and Jacobs formulae) can be interpreted as approximations of a single equation…”
• Perspectives on the Future of Land Surface Models and the Challenges of Representing Complex Terrestrial Systems (2020, background): “…of canopy nitrogen to CO2 fertilization (Franklin, 2007; Franklin et al., 2009), control of stomata to maximize assimilation while avoiding dessication (Bonan et al., 2014; Eller et al., 2018; Kennedy et al., 2019; Medlyn et al., 2011; Williams et al., 1996; Wolf et al., 2016; X. Xu et al., 2016).”
• Comparison of Big‐Leaf, Two‐Big‐Leaf, and Two‐Leaf Upscaling Schemes for Evapotranspiration Estimation Using Coupled Carbon‐Water Modeling (2018, positive): “Ci is dynamically adjusted in plants shown in Figure 9 until the model realizes an optimal water use efficiency (WUE; Medlyn et al., 2011; Sellers, 1997; Wang et al., 2017).”
• Plantecophys - An R Package for Analysing and Modelling Leaf Gas Exchange Data (2015, background): “[24], which is given by Eq 6 (in this example, I assumed g0 = 0) gs 1⁄4 g0 þ 1:6ð1þ g1 ffiffi ð p DÞÞ An Ca ð6Þ”