Changes in leaf hydraulic conductance correlate with leaf vein embolism in Cercis siliquastrum L.

104 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Leaf hydraulics. (2006, background): “The protection conferred will vary according to species, because species differ in whether whole leaves, petioles, and midribs are more (17, 22, 28, 49, 84, 105, 108, 125), equally (33), or less (32, 49, 83, 122) vulnerable to loss of conductance compared with the stem as leaf declines (and xylem te”
Carbon dynamics in trees: feast or famine? (2012, background): “Leaves (Zwieniecki et al. 2000, Nardini et al., 2001, 2003, Bucci et al. 2003, LoGullo et al. 2005, Johnson et al. 2009, 2011) and roots (McCully et al. 1998, Domec et al. 2006) seem particularly prone to losing and regaining a substantial fraction of their xylem hydraulic conductivity diurnally,…”
Hydraulic architecture of leaf blades: where is the main resistance? (2004, result): “This finding would be in agreement with the impact of vein cavitation on leaf hydraulics which, in many cases, has been found to be less than expected on the basis of countings of ultrasound acoustic emissions and visual observations of the functionality of leaf veins (Nardini, Tyree & Salleo 2001; ”