A critique of the cross-lagged panel model.

By E. Hamaker, Rebecca M. Kuiper, Raoul P. P. P. Grasman. Psychological methods, 2015

3,383 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Health, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5650eb34b61305435e22d2e5ab5daf1462bbadb8

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. Karin Sanders
2. Timothy C. Bednall
3. Lars Leszczensky
4. W. V. D. Schuur
5. L. Keijsers
6. Steffen Zitzmann
7. Susanne E. Baumgartner
8. Tobias Wolbring

In Health

1. Lars Leszczensky
2. Steffen Zitzmann
3. Tobias Wolbring
4. Martin Hecht
5. Satoshi Usami

In Social Psychology

1. Karin Sanders
2. Timothy C. Bednall
3. Chris J. Jackson
4. Lars Leszczensky
5. W. V. D. Schuur
6. L. Keijsers
7. Steffen Zitzmann
8. Susanne E. Baumgartner

Citations in the corpus

• How to Deal With Reverse Causality Using Panel Data? Recommendations for Researchers Based on a Simulation Study (2019, methodology): “Hamaker et al. (2015) recently introduced a random intercept cross-lagged panel model (RI-CLPM) in the structural equation modeling literature that achieves a similar thing as the ML-SEM method proposed by Allison, Williams, and MoralBenito (2017), that is, it provides estimates that are not biased…”
• Reciprocal associations between shyness, self-esteem, loneliness, depression and Internet addiction in Chinese adolescents (2020, background): “Hamaker et al. (2015) reported the poor performance of CLPM, which may be because the constructs became more trait-like to some extent.”
• Innovative behaviour: how much transformational leadership do you need? (2018, positive): “To investigate the effects of each manager’s level of transformational leadership over time, the data were analysed using a random intercepts cross-lagged panel model (RI-CLPM; Hamaker, Kuiper and Grasman, 2015).”
• Parental monitoring and adolescent problem behaviors (2016, background): “A recent simulation study was conducted to test whether crosslagged models adequately estimate parameters when processes at the between-person level and the within-person level are opposing (Hamaker et al., 2015).”
• The Relationship Between Media Multitasking and Attention Problems in Adolescents: Results of Two Longitudinal Studies (2017, methodology): “As has been shown by Hamaker et al. (2015), common CLPM may lead to incorrect conclusions about long ‐ term relationships between two variables.”