Relationships among Multiple Identities

By Peter J. Burke. 2003

188 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5612d809c3c5ca57d97cba1ec40c75d1085ee1fd

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Social Psychology

1. R. Kark
2. Karl Aquino
3. O. Epitropaki
4. Jan E. Stets
5. D. Oyserman
6. C. Mainemelis
7. R. Lord
8. Americus Reed

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Karl Aquino
2. Jan E. Stets
3. D. Oyserman
4. Peter J. Burke
5. Dan Freeman
6. Americus Reed
7. C. Colbeck
8. M. Harrod

Citations in the corpus

• Professional identity development theory and doctoral education (2008, background): “…a sense of shared meanings across different identities, whether those identities are invoked within a single group or within intersecting groups (Burke, 2003b), may help doctoral students craft professional identities that integrate their identities as researcher, teacher, and service provider.”
• Verification Across Multiple Identities: The Role of Status (2004, methodology): “Following others (Burke 2003; Tsushima and Burke 1999), in Figure 2 we model multiple identities and arrange them hierarchically in the identity control system.”
• Possible selves and academic outcomes: How and when possible selves impel action. (2006, background): “Why might PSs fail to sustain self-regulatory action? Given that the self is multidimensional and includes multiple potentially competing goals (e.g., Abrams, 1994; Burke, 2003; King & Smith, 2004; Oyserman, 2001; Settles, 2004), a particular PS may fail to sustain self-regulatory action because it ”
• The Development of Identity Theory (2014, background): “A study of leadership within a group examined the relationship between two identities (the task identity and socioemotional identity) for individuals in task-oriented groups (Burke, 2003).”
• New Directions in Identity Control Theory (2005, methodology): “Over time, the simple theory of correspondence became elaborated and more fully developed based upon a systematic program of research (Burke, 1991; Stets & Burke, 2003), especially with the incorporation of ideas based on perceptual control theory (Powers, 1973).”
• Testing a social-cognitive model of moral behavior: the interactive influence of situations and moral identity centrality. (2009, background): “One way to alleviate this aversive state would be for a person to deactivate one of the incompatible facets of identity (Burke, 2003).”
• Leadership and followership identity processes: A multilevel review ☆ (2017, methodology): “One of the first self-report measures is Burke's (2003) Task Leadership Identity and Social Emotional Identity Scales that were used in an experimental setting to examine how the multiple identities that an individual holds can relate to each other and influence behavior. More recently, Hiller (2005”
• Entrepreneurial identity formation during the initial entrepreneurial experience: The influence of simulation feedback and existing identity (2018, background): “…expectations operate within individual, relational and collective social norms that define what constitutes acceptable behavior within society (Burke, 2003), thus providing a basis for individuals to gauge which actions are appropriate within a particular identity (Shepherd & Haynie, 2009).”
• Ecological Identity: The Development and Assessment of a Measurement Scale (2018, background): “In contrast to the notion of connectedness, identity is often used to refer to meanings attached to the self that locate and embed individuals within webs of social relationships based on shared personal characteristics, roles, and group memberships (Burke, 2003; Stryker, 2008).”
• Examining Emotions in Identity Theory (2005, background): “…occur (in response to an interruption) to bring self-relevant meanings in the situation into congruence with the identity standard, identity change is also occurring because the identity standard is simultaneously moving toward self-relevant meanings in the situation (Burke 2002, 2003, 2004).”
• Social Identity and Self-Regulation (2007, unknown): “Individuals can categorize themselves at various levels of ab-434 stractness and can define themselves in terms of multiple social identities that connect and intersect in different ways (Burke, 2003; Roccas & Brewer, 2002).”