Examining Emotions in Identity Theory

By Jan E. Stets. 2005

139 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/862fb66f353ec59d2b787e44a4bd689cace62c5a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Time Pressure Promotes Work Engagement Test of Illegitimate Tasks as Boundary Condition (2015, background): “The threat to identity is evaluated as particularly stressful (Stets, 2005).”
Towards a Theory of Collective Emotions (2013, background): “The shaping of emotions has been shown for different institutional settings (Turner, 2007), stratified groups (Collett & Lizardo, 2010), gender (Simon & Nath, 2004), race (Harvey Wingfield, 2010), identity (Stets, 2005), and culture (Heise, 2010).”
New Directions in Identity Control Theory (2005, background): “identities are clearly social ( Burke, 2004a ), orienting not only a person or holder of an identity to maintain certain meanings, but others with whom the person comes in contact so that others know with whom (with what identity) they are interacting.”
Explaining the Under-Representation of Women in Leadership Positions of Sport Organizations: A Symbolic Interactionist Perspective (2007, methodology): “Finally, Stets (2005) tested the identity control process through experimental methods.”
Leadership and followership identity processes: A multilevel review ☆ (2017, background): “Stets (2005) argued that the relation between emotion and identity is more complex and more contextual than indicated by Stryker (1987).”
Pathways of Passion (2014, background): “For example, identity theorists are quick to highlight the links between emotions and the centrality and salience of an identity (Stets, 2005; Stryker, 2004).”
The Development of Identity Theory (2014, background): “In a study that extended the worker identity studies discussed earlier, some participants had an opportunity to get to know their coworker for 10 minutes before the study began (this was the “familiar” condition and was a proxy for significant others) compared to not being given this opportunity (th”
The Sociology of Emotions: Basic Theoretical Arguments (2009, background): “When there is incongruence, a person will experience distress (see also Stets, 2005).”