Impact of the Number of Response Categories and Anchor Labels on Coefficient Alpha and Test-Retest Reliability
By Li-Jen Weng. 2004
430 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Management Science and Operations Research, Statistics and Probability
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/551bd53af553a9e1ce5b7043b6df909c3ca04df4
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Management Science and Operations Research
In Statistics and Probability
Citations in the corpus
- Measuring the Mathematical Attitudes of Elementary Students: The Effects of a 4-Point or 5-Point Likert-Type Scale (2010, background): “Hypothesized explanations for the variability in the effects of the number of response categories on internal consistency reliability include the scale’s item homogeneity (Bourke & Frampton, 1992; Komorita & Graham, 1965; Weng, 2004) and the variability of opinions (Masters, 1974; Weng, 2004).”
- Measuring Teachers’ enjoyment, anger, and anxiety: The Teacher Emotions Scales (TES) (2016, background): “The 4-point scale also made it possible to meaningfully verbally label each of the answers, which has been shown to increase the psychometric quality of scales (Weng, 2004).”
- The Impact of Outliers on Cronbach’s Coefficient Alpha Estimate of Reliability: Ordinal/Rating Scale Item Responses (2010, background): “However, it is not yet clear how it affects the associated psychometric properties (e.g., Krieg, 1999; Weng, 2004).”
- National cultures and safety orientation: A study of seafarers working for Norwegian shipping companies (2007, background): “An even number of response alternatives forces commitment from the respondents, and research indicates that scales with more response categories tend to result in higher reliability (Weng, 2004).”
- A Review of Key Likert Scale Development Advances: 1995–2019 (2021, methodology): “The advice in this table was taken from Mackenzie (2003), Locke (2012), and Podsakoff et al.”
- Effect of the Number of Response Categories on the Reliability and Validity of Rating Scales (2008, background): “Some authors (Aiken, 1983; Boote, 1981; Brown, Widing, & Coulter, 1991; McCallum, Keith, & Wiebe, 1988, Weng, 2004) maintain that although reliability tends to increase as the number of response options rises, when the number of alternatives exceeds five or six, reliability hardly increases further.”
- Response Styles in Survey Research: A Literature Review of Antecedents, Consequences, and Remedies (2013, methodology): “Response scales have also been examined with many other criteria— for example, reliability, information recovery, distribution of scale means, and ease of use (see Preston & Colman, 2000; Weng, 2004)—resulting in similar recommendations with respect to the optimal number of response categories.”
- Validity: Meaning and Relevancy in Assessment for Engineering Education Research (2015, background): “Educational measurement experts have extensively discussed the appropriate use of the coefficient alpha as a gauge for internal consistency and ways to increase consistency (Cortina, 1993; Schmitt, 1996; Weng, 2004).”
- Impact of the Number of Scale Points on Data Characteristics and Respondents’ Evaluations: An Experimental Design Approach Using 5-Point and 7-Point Likert-type Scales (2016, neutral): “; L.J.Weng, (2004).”
- Relation between active mediation, exposure to Daniel Tiger’s Neighborhood, and US preschoolers’ social and emotional development (2016, background): “…options consistent with response options for other measures in the survey, and to coincide with best practices for the appropriate number of response options (between 3 and 7) to achieve greatest validity and reliability (Krosnick & Presser, 2010; Lozano, García-Cueto, & Muñiz, 2008; Weng, 2004).”
- Performance of Velicer’s Minimum Average Partial Factor Retention Method With Categorical Variables (2011, methodology): “Furthermore, we opted for a maximum of 7 response categories because the reliability and validity of ordinal measures appears to level off after reaching this number of scale points (Preston & Colman, 2000; Weng, 2004).”