Validity: Meaning and Relevancy in Assessment for Engineering Education Research

By Kerrie Anna Douglas, Ș. Purzer. 2015

124 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Education, Media Technology, Safety Research

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/bf3a56b1839b64532e634214b94d9614e6a0e8bc

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Education

1. L. Luk
2. Katie James
3. Brian D. Gane
4. Louis V. DiBello
5. James W. Pellegrino
6. Cecilia Ka Yuk Chan
7. Yue Zhao
8. N. Jorion

In Media Technology

1. L. Luk
2. Cecilia Ka Yuk Chan
3. Yue Zhao

In Safety Research

1. Cecilia Ka Yuk Chan

Citations in the corpus

• A Validated and Reliable Instrument Investigating Engineering Students’ Perceptions of Competency in Generic Skills (2017, background): “In addition to addressing the issue of generalizability, the plans and suggestions for further research outlined above reflect our belief in the importance of continuous reevaluation to enhance the quality of assessment instruments in engineering education research (Douglas & Purzer, 2015).”
• An Analytic Framework for Evaluating the Validity of Concept Inventory Claims (2015, background): “Douglas and Purzer (2015) and Pellegrino, DiBello, and Brophy (2014) discuss the implications of this contemporary view of validity for engineering education research.”