Toward Reduction of Prejudice: Intergroup Contact and Social Categorization

152 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Recognizing the benefits of diversity: When and how does diversity increase group performance? (2010, background): “As pointed out by Brewer and Gaertner (2004), there are several laboratory experiments that have tested a number of moderating factors to”
Interacting dimensions of diversity: Cross-categorization and the functioning of diverse work groups (2007, background): “The higher the comparative fit of possible subgroups within the diverse team, the more people will be inclined to perceive the group as consisting of subgroups (i.e., subgroup categorization; Brewer, 2000; Brewer & Gaertner, 2001; Earley & Mosakowski, 2000; Hewstone, Rubin, & Willis, 2002).”
Mediated Intergroup Contact: Concept Explication, Synthesis, and Application (2012, background): “Clearly, these trends demand improved intergroup relations, and direct contact between members of different groups has traditionally been considered the way to achieve that (Brewer & Gaertner, 2001).”
Generalized Trust Through Civic Engagement? Evidence from Five National Panel Studies (2015, background): “In this literature, it is examined how certain interactions can positively adjust stereotypes and prejudices, breaking down social categorizations of in- and out-group (Brewer & Gaertner, 2001; Rothbart, 2001).”