Mapping and Valuing Ecosystem Services as an Approach for Conservation and Natural‐Resource Management

By Heather Tallis, Stephen Polasky. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 2009

605 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Global and Planetary Change

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/545c39dad3c9a01cb1c57c05a355cf67ee30888a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Global and Planetary Change

Citations in the corpus

Mapping ecosystem services' values: current practice and future prospects. (2013, background): “Thereby, land use policies can be identified, that maximise total ecosystem service values (Tallis and Polasky, 2009; De Groot et al., 2010).”
A general biodiversity–function relationship is mediated by trophic level (2017, background): “Th ese production functions can support management decisions targeting provisioning of ecosystem services, such as by evaluating ecosystem service provisioning under diff erent scenarios (Barbier 2007, Nelson et al. 2009, Tallis and Polasky 2009).”
Science in support of ecosystem-based management for the US West Coast and beyond (2010, background): “A clear framework for how such production function models can be developed, even in data-poor situations, is described elsewhere (Tallis and Polasky, 2009).”
Evaluating tradeoffs among ecosystem services to inform marine spatial planning (2013, methodology): “When applied to ecosystem services, production 95 functions are models that translate the structure and functioning of ecosystems into the provision 96 of ecosystem services [40, 44, 45].”
Estimating Pinus palustris tree diameter and stem volume from tree height, crown area and stand-level parameters (2014, background): “Climate change mitigation through reduced loss of stored carbon (Putz et al. 2008) and provision of other ecosystem services (Tallis and Polasky 2009) are important applications that require accurate stand estimations.”
Cost-benefit analysis in the context of ecosystem services for human well-being: A multidisciplinary critique (2011, background): “…ecological knowledge is available, deliberative approaches can benefit from the use of biophysical models that project the level of ecosystem services provided under different scenarios, such as maps and trade-off curves, but without attempting their economic valuation (Tallis and Polasky, 2009).”
Evosystem services: an evolutionary perspective on the links between biodiversity and human well-being (2010, background): “[28] (see also [18,29]) echoed earlier regional trade-off studies in concluding that: ‘Land use/land cover.”
Interactions Among Ecosystem Services Across Land Uses in a Floodplain (2014, background): “Consequences of these trade-offs need to be assessed across temporal and spatial scales by policy makers prior to management actions such that managers can make effective decisions (Rodríguez et al. 2005, 2006, Tallis and Polasky 2009, Cabell and Oelofse 2012).”
Indicators of ecosystem service potential at European scales: Mapping marginal changes and trade-offs (2012, background): “Much work has focused on trying to capture relationships though the development of ‘production’ and ‘value’ functions (e.g. Daily and Matson, 2008; Kienast et al., 2009; Tallis et al., 2008; Tallis and Polasky, 2009), that model the link between ecosystem service”
Landscapes' Capacities to Provide Ecosystem Services - a Concept for Land-Cover Based Assessments (2009, methodology): “The value or benefit transfer method, in which the valuation results of ecosystem services at one study site are transferred to others, has been criticised for neglecting spatial differences of habitat types (Tallis & Polasky 2009, Nelson et al. 2009).”
Trade-offs across value-domains in ecosystem services assessment. (2014, methodology): “…ervices values (de Groot et al., 2010; Layke et al., 2012; Seppelt t al., 2011), (2) combine the information from the biophysicalupply to the users’ demand (Tallis and Polasky, 2009); and (3) xplore the multiple value-domains of ecosystem services (Anton t al., 2010; de Groot et al., 2010).”