Evaluating tradeoffs among ecosystem services to inform marine spatial planning
By S. Lester, C. Costello, B. Halpern, S. Gaines, Crow White, John A. Barth. 2013
321 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Global and Planetary Change, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5c1ec9234f6a7db4aa0db569e502e2706eb5b48f
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Global and Planetary Change
In Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
Citations in the corpus
- A review on trade-off analysis of ecosystem services for sustainable land-use management (2016, background): “Lester et al. (2013) conducted a review on the ecosystem services trade-off analysis framework that based on economic theory, and summarized six common types of ecosystem service interactions based on the insights gained from frontier shapes, including non-interacting services, direct trade-off,…”
- Connecting SDG 14 with the other Sustainable Development Goals through marine spatial planning (2017, background): “In cases where it is not possible to maximize all interacting services simultaneously, society is forced to hierarchize between different functions and uses of marine space [72].”
- Conservation Challenges of Predator Recovery (2016, background): “or nonlinear, and there may exist combinations that maximize both goals at minimal cost to either one (Lester et al. 2013).”