Indicators of ecosystem service potential at European scales: Mapping marginal changes and trade-offs

By Roy Haines-Young, M. Potschin, F. Kienast. 2012

323 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, Global and Planetary Change

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a90c471fb4feda057469076a52a04f4e114c66d7

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In General Agricultural and Biological Sciences

In Global and Planetary Change

Citations in the corpus

European agricultural landscapes, common agricultural policy and ecosystem services: a review (2013, background): “In this approach, the functions of a specific land cover type (originating from European land cover data) are established by expert judgment and case study analysis (Burkhard et al. 2010).”
Synergies and trade-offs between ecosystem services in Costa Rica (2013, background): “A few studies used spatial and dynamic approaches (Nelson et al. 2008, 2009; Haines-Young et al. 2012; Willemen et al. 2012).”
A review on trade-off analysis of ecosystem services for sustainable land-use management (2016, background): “Correlation analysis of the trade-offs based on mapping simply identifies the interactions between pairs of ecosystem services, while trade-offs and synergies are more generally found within the bundles of services, indicating that a more integrated perspective on bundles of services is required for”
Mapping ecosystem service supply, demand and budgets (2012, background): “Paetzold et al. (2010) note that the status of an cosystem service is influenced not only by its provision, but also y human needs and the desired level of provision for this service y the society, which connects supply and demand of ecosystem ervices inseparably (Syrbe and Walz, 2012).”
“Maps have an air of authority”: Potential benefits and challenges of ecosystem service maps at different levels of decision making (2013, methodology): “There are also a growing number of analyses on various spatial scales that map and analyse trade-offs between different ecosystem services (e.g. Haines-Young et al., 2012; Raudsepp-Hearne et al., 2010).”
Solutions for sustaining natural capital and ecosystem services (2012, methodology): “…apply methods, data and models, which are characterized by a higher level of complexity and are embedded in broader ecosystem service contexts (e.g. Haines-Young et al., 2012; Frank et al., 2012; van Oudenhoven et al., 2012; Nedkov and Burkhard, 2012); iii) Several articles apply and/or present…”
A review of Bayesian belief networks in ecosystem service modelling (2013, background): “Therefore, a range of dynamic, spatially explicit and multidisciplinary ESS models have been developed, varying from basic qualitative models (e.g. Haines-Young et al., 2012) to complex mechanistic models which generally strive for thorough quantification of ESS flows and values (Kareiva et al.,…”
Current Status and Future Prospects for the Assessment of Marine and Coastal Ecosystem Services: A Systematic Review (2013, unknown): “[13,32–34]).”
Ecosystem services inclusive strategic environmental assessment (2013, result): “MEA (2005) suggested, and many authors and studies have confirmed (Geneletti, 2011; Haines-Young et al., 2012; Partidario and Slootweg, 2012; Pereira et al., 2009; Slootweg et al., 2010; TEEB, The . rights reserved.”