Trade-offs across value-domains in ecosystem services assessment.

By B. Martín‐López, E. Gómez‐Baggethun, M. García-Llorente, C. Montes. 2014

543 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Global and Planetary Change

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/efc7a3c512155f2406874f3d9f2af00387240ed2

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Global and Planetary Change

Citations in the corpus

A quantitative review of relationships between ecosystem services (2014, background): “Mart́ın-López et al., 2007; Raudsepp-Hearne et al., 2010). However, Rodŕıguez et al. (2006) confirmed that the relationship between cultural and provisioning services is trade-off, as forest management for timber production could discourage peo365”
Ecosystem service trade-offs from supply to social demand: A landscape-scale spatial analysis (2014, unknown): “Recent publications recommend that ecosystem service research should consider and implement different valuedimensions (biophysical, socio-cultural and economic) to provide complementary information regarding ecosystem services (Jax, Barton, Chan, Groot, & Doyle, 2013; Martín-López et al., 2014).”
Fairly efficient, efficiently fair: Lessons from designing and testing payment schemes for ecosystem services in Asia (2015, background): “Beyond its potential, however, the issue of strategic use of information (Martín-López et al., 2014), a discrepancy between scale in the provision of ES and its investment and the vested interests of intermediaries and donors hinder the optimal use of B.”
Selecting methods for ecosystem service assessment: a decision tree approach (2017, background): “Research related to ecosystem service assessment has grown considerably over the last two decades (Luck et al., 2009; Martín-López et al., 2014; Vihervaara et al., 2010).”
A new valuation school: Integrating diverse values of nature in resource and land use decisions (2016, background): “…by the urgency of addressing sustainability challenges, are working to operationalize integrated valuation approaches at different levels, i.e. from place-based research (e.g. Martín-López et al., 2014; Cabral et al., 2016; Phelan and Jacobs, 2016) to regional and global assessments (IPBES, 2015).”
Using the Concepts of Green Infrastructure and Ecosystem Services to Specify Leitbilder for Compact and Green Cities—The Example of the Landscape Plan of Dresden (Germany) (2017, background): “When considering both the supply and demand of services, it is essential to conduct an interand transdisciplinary dialogue [62].”