Reducing prejudice through cross-categorization: Effects of multiple social identities.

By M. Brewer. 2000

137 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5397097d2d19591d18051412c4e2dbee9b6bccb3

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Interacting dimensions of diversity: Cross-categorization and the functioning of diverse work groups (2007, background): “The higher the comparative fit of possible subgroups within the diverse team, the more people will be inclined to perceive the group as consisting of subgroups (i.e., subgroup categorization; Brewer, 2000; Brewer & Gaertner, 2001; Earley & Mosakowski, 2000; Hewstone, Rubin, & Willis, 2002).”
Does a common ingroup identity reduce intergroup threat? (2010, background): “Since a purely “one group” representation decreases the salience of former subgroup boundaries and may increase perceptions of cooperation (Brewer, 2000), the one-group representation could thereby reduce realistic threat more effectively than a “dual identity.””
Reducing Competitive Victimhood in Kosovo: The Role of Extended Contact and Common Ingroup Identity (2012, background): “Because perceiving the ingroup and the outgroup as belonging to a single enlarged group enhances the impression that the two groups share a similar fate (Brewer, 2000), it is plausible to hypothesize that a high degree of common ingroup identification would predispose individuals to believe that out”
Cultural distance, mindfulness and passive xenophobia: using Integrated Threat Theory to explore home higher education students’ perspectives on ‘internationalisation at home’ (2009, background): “Drawing on social identity theory (Tajfel & Turner, 1986), Brewer (2000) asserts that the process of separation into ingroups and outgroups is a natural part of human experience.”
When do interprofessional teams succeed? Investigating the moderating roles of team and professional identity in interprofessional effectiveness (2011, background): “Cutting across categorically aligned subgroup members encourages members to focus on similarities (Brewer, 2000) and reduces psychological distance between subgroups (Crisp et al.”
Intent and Ordinary Bias: Unintended Thought and Social Motivation Create Casual Prejudice (2004, unknown): “Changing group boundaries to create crosscutting categories can change the boundaries of trust and reduce prejudice between mutual outgroups (Brewer, 2000; Dovidio et al., 2000).”
Shared Family Identity, Age Salience, and Intergroup Contact: Investigation of the Grandparent–Grandchild Relationship (2006, background): “…terms of outgroup generalization, although experimental research indicates that cross-categorization (i.e., identifying with two contrasting groups; Brewer, 2000) and superordinate categorization (e.g., identifying as Americans instead of Republican and Democrats; Gaertner & Dovidio, 2000) may…”
Do Workgroup Faultlines Help or Hurt? A Moderated Model of Faultlines, Team Identification, and Group Performance (2009, background): “The strength of team identity, which cuts across demographically aligned subgroup members, places members’ emphasis on similarities across subgroups (Brewer 2000).”
Intergroup bias. (2002, background): “…ISSUES Various methodological paradigms allow us to separate the two components of in-group favoritism and out-group derogation by including independent assessment of in-group and out-group evaluations (e.g., Bettencourt & Dorr 1998, Brewer et al. 1993, Islam & Hewstone 1993a, Singh et al. 1997).”