Formal mentoring systems: An examination of the effects of mentor-protégé cognitive styles on the mentoring process

By S. Armstrong, Christopher W. Allinson, J. Hayes. 2002

189 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5380bc6ebb74d3b400348f700c1384d673c4f2ea

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

1. Melenie J. Lankau
2. Frankie J. Weinberg

In Clinical Psychology

1. Melenie J. Lankau
2. Frankie J. Weinberg
3. Rajashi Ghosh

In Social Psychology

1. Melenie J. Lankau
2. Frankie J. Weinberg
3. Rajashi Ghosh
4. Tammy D. Allen

Citations in the corpus

• Formal Mentoring Programs: A Mentor-Centric and Longitudinal Analysis (2011, methodology): “…and Cotton (1999): Appelbaum and his colleagues (1994) found that the gender composition of mentoring dyads significantly affects the mentoring relationship such that a cross-gender relationship of a female mentor–male protégé relationship has the least beneficial outcomes (Armstrong et al., 2002).”
• Looking for Professor Right: mentee selection of mentors in a formal mentoring program (2011, background): “Like the study conducted by Armstrong et al. (2002), mentoring participants who demonstrated mutual liking not only enhanced the quality of mentoring relationships, but also, in our cohorts, gave strong indications that they would continue their relationship after the formal part of the program had ”
• Building successful leadership coaching relationships: Examining impact of matching criteria in a leadership coaching program (2010, unknown): “Findings from mentoring research suggest that homogeneity is preferable and perhaps a prerequisite for mutual understanding and acceptance ( Armstrong et al. , 2002”