Multi-criteria Decision Making Methods: A Comparative Study

By Evangelos Triantaphyllou. 2000

2,208 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Management Science and Operations Research

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/53461c08c92b0503129a24d6950df0d55f6b6613

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Management Science and Operations Research

Citations in the corpus

Optimal Conductor Size Selection and Reconductoring in Radial Distribution Systems Using a Mixed-Integer LP Approach (2013, methodology): “In order to support the decision process, several multi-criteria decision analysis methods can be used, as shown in [23].”
Towards the development of a decision support system for water resource management (2005, methodology): “Critical criterion method (Triantaphyllou, 2000) Numerical approach to sensitivity analysis seeking for the criterion which may change the alternatives’ ranking through the minimal modification of its current weight Fi Fj ajk aik %wk”
Ranking irregularities when evaluating alternatives by using some ELECTRE methods (2008, methodology): “The above subject, along with some rank irregularity issues, has been discussed in detail in [Triantaphyllou, 2000 and 2001].”
Extended VIKOR method in comparison with outranking methods (2007, methodology): “E-mail addresses: seropric@yahoo.com, seropric@grf.bg.ac.yu (S. Opricovic). multicriteria methods, SMART (weighted sum), Centroid method, and PROMETHEE, was presented by Olson (2001), and a comparative study of MCDM methods is presented in (Triantaphyllou, 2000).”
Fuzzy VIKOR with an application to water resources planning (2011, methodology): “A comparative analysis of MCDM methods is presented in several publications (Escobar & Moreno-Jimenez, 2002; Opricovic & Tzeng, 2007; Triantaphyllou, 2000).”
Application of a quantitative multiple criteria decision making (MCDM-1) approach to the analysis of investments in construction (2007, methodology): “This group consists of widely known methods from multicriteria utility theory (Keeney, Raiffa, 1976; Zavadskas et al., 1995) and some new methods (Hwang, Yoon 1981; Triantaphyllou 2000; Zavadskas et al., 2004; Brauers, 2004; Ustinovichius 2004).”
Some induced ordered weighted averaging operators and their use for solving group decision-making problems based on fuzzy preference relations (2007, background): “Several authors have provided interesting results on group decision-making (GDM) or social choice theory and multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) with the help of fuzzy sets theory [7,9,12,14,18,19,31,32].”
An assessment of sustainable housing affordability using a multiple criteria decision making method (2013, neutral): “A matrix format easily expresses the MCDM problem [24].”
Comparative analysis of MCDM methods for the assessment of sustainable housing affordability (2016, positive): “The normalized value rij is calculated as[32]:”
Specific character of objective methods for determining weights of criteria in MCDM problems: Entropy, CRITIC and SD (2021, methodology): “A significant number of multi-criteria decision-making methods (MCDM) constructs the performance indicator of alternatives, taking into account the weights of the criteria (Hwang & Yoon, 1981; Triantaphyllou, 2000; Tzeng & Huang, 2011; Pamucar & Savin, 2020).”
Multimoora for the EU member states updated with fuzzy number theory (2011, methodology): “In this study the COA method will be applied to obtain the Best Non-fuzzy Performance (BNP) value: ( ) ( ) 3A c a b aBNP a− + −= + , (8) where a, b and c are respectively the lower, modal, and upper values of fuzzy number ( , , )A a b c= 2 (Triantaphyllou 2000; Zavadskas and Antucheviciene 2006).”