Application of a quantitative multiple criteria decision making (MCDM-1) approach to the analysis of investments in construction
By Leonas Ustinovichius, Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas, Valentinas Podvezko. 2007
170 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0e8ff06c6e41793be4bbb7362a364de53a6154ff
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas
- Violeta Keršulienė
- Dragisa Stanujkic
- Romualdas Ginevicius
- Friedel Peldschus
- Nedeljko Magdalinovic
- Rodoljub Jovanovic
- Sanja Stojanovic
Citations in the corpus
- A new additive ratio assessment (ARAS) method in multicriteria decision‐making (2010, methodology): “Techniques and planning methods and decision-making methods develop dynamically (Kapliński 2008c; Peldschus 2008; Ginevičius and Podvezko 2008..., a, b; Zavadskas et al. 2008c; Ustinovichius et al. 2007; Plebankiewicz 2009; Ulubeyli and Kazaz 2009; Jakimavicius and Burinskiene 2009; Šijanec Zavrl et”
- Selection of rational dispute resolution method by applying new step‐wise weight assessment ratio analysis (Swara) (2010, methodology): “Considering the nature of information available to decision makers, MADM can be divided into the following groups (Ustinovichius et al. 2007; Brauers et al. 2008): a) The method of rank correlation consisting of totalising ranks is the first method to be considered.”
- Evaluating the changes in economic and social development of Lithuanian counties by multiple criteria methods (2009, methodology): “…evaluation methods, allowing generalization of the criteria, having various dimensions and changing in various directions, should be used (Ginevičius 2008; Podvezko 2008; Ginevičius, Podvezko 2008d, e; Turskis et al. 2009; Zavadskas et al. 2008a; Brauers et al. 2008b; Ustinovichius et al. 2007).”
- An objective multi-criteria approach to optimization using MOORA method and interval grey numbers (2012, methodology): “The presented procedure of COPRAS method indicates that it can be easily applied for evaluating the alternatives and selecting the most efficient one, with decision maker being completely aware of the physical meaning of the process (Ustinovichius et al. 2007).”
- The Comparative Analysis of MCDA Methods SAW and COPRAS (2011, unknown): “…al. 2007; Kracka et al. 2010; Liaudanskiene et al. 2009; Plebankiewicz 2009; Podvezko 2007, 2009; Podvezko, Podviezko 2010; Selih et al. 2008; Turskis et al. 2009; Ustinovichius et al. 2007; Urbanavicienė et al. 2009a,b; Zavadskas, Vaidogas 2008, Zavadskas et al. 2007a,b, 2010; Zavrl et al. 2009).”
- Experience of the game theory application in construction management (2008, background): “…matrix games is the selection of variants, which is a problem of multi-criteria decisions (Peldschus et al. 1983b, 2005, 2007a; Antuchevičienė et al. 2006; Meszek, 2001, 2004, 2007; Ustinovichius et al., 2007; Zagorskas and Turskis 2006; Zavadskas and Kaklauskas 2007; Zavadskas and Turskis 2008).”
- The analysis of the quality of the results obtained with the methods of multi‐criteria decisions (2009, methodology): “…Zavadskas et al. 2006; Zavadskas, Vaidogas 2008; Morkvėnas et al. 2008; Jakimavičius, Burinskienė 2007; Maskeliūnaitė et al. 2009) and new methods (Ustinovichius et al. 2007; Brauers and Zavadskas 2006; Brauers et al. 2008; Peldschus and Zavadskas 2005; Zavadskas et al. 2007, 2008a, b; Ginevicius…”